Comparative Performance of GLMM and GEE for Longitudinal Beta Regression in Economic Inequality Modelling

Due to the shortcomings of conventional Gaussian methods, specialized models are frequently needed for longitudinal data analysis with bounded outcomes, such as the Gini ratio. In order to model economic inequality in Indonesia, this study compares the effectiveness of Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMM) and Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) for beta-distributed longitudinal data. Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and pseudo R-squared values are used to assess model performance using panel data from 10 provinces between 2018 and 2024 as well as important socioeconomic indicators. With lower RMSE and higher explanatory power across all provincial subsets, the results consistently demonstrate that GLMM performs better than both GEE and generalized linear models (GLM). ANOVA tests verify that modeling methodologies, not data heterogeneity in GRDP or Gini values, are responsible for the differences in model performance. These results demonstrate how well GLMM handles complex data structures and within-subject correlations, providing more accurate and effective estimates in longitudinal beta regression scenarios. The study encourages the use of GLMM for more precise longitudinal analysis in economic and social research and offers insightful information for researchers modeling inequality indices.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Advance Sustainable Science Engineering and Technology
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26877/7y0xxb39
Primary Topic
Global Trade and Competitiveness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Performance of GLMM and GEE for Longitudinal Beta Regression in Economic Inequality Modelling

Khairil Anwar Notodiputro, Anang Kurnia, ERFIANI ERFIANI, Pardomuan Robinson Sihombing
Advance Sustainable Science Engineering and Technology
Global Trade and Competitiveness
article

Comparative Performance of GLMM and GEE for Longitudinal Beta Regression in Economic Inequality Modelling

Khairil Anwar Notodiputro, Anang Kurnia, ERFIANI ERFIANI, Pardomuan Robinson Sihombing
article en

Abstract

Due to the shortcomings of conventional Gaussian methods, specialized models are frequently needed for longitudinal data analysis with bounded outcomes, such as the Gini ratio. In order to model economic inequality in Indonesia, this study compares the effectiveness of Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMM) and Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) for beta-distributed longitudinal data. Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and pseudo R-squared values are used to assess model performance using panel data from 10 provinces between 2018 and 2024 as well as important socioeconomic indicators. With lower RMSE and higher explanatory power across all provincial subsets, the results consistently demonstrate that GLMM performs better than both GEE and generalized linear models (GLM). ANOVA tests verify that modeling methodologies, not data heterogeneity in GRDP or Gini values, are responsible for the differences in model performance. These results demonstrate how well GLMM handles complex data structures and within-subject correlations, providing more accurate and effective estimates in longitudinal beta regression scenarios. The study encourages the use of GLMM for more precise longitudinal analysis in economic and social research and offers insightful information for researchers modeling inequality indices.

Advance Sustainable Science Engineering and TechnologyVol. 7(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Global Trade and Competitiveness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.