Bio-Derived Electrodes Based on a Vitamin K Cathode Material and a Mussel-Inspired Binder for Sustainable Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries
Due to the higher volumetric capacity of Zinc (Zn) (5855 mAh cm–3), greater earth abundance, safer and more stable operation, aqueous Zn-ion batteries are a promising alternative to Lithium-ion batteries. Furthermore, using organic compounds as the components of Zn-ion batteries is an appealing option for developing low-cost and sustainable batteries. With this in mind, we describe the design and application of a novel polymer based on Vitamin K (POxaVK) (Qtheo = 176 mAh g–1) as a cathode material for Zn-ion batteries. Due to the poor conductivity of the polymer, we sought to improve the performance of POxaVK by combining it with a bioderived mussel-inspired polymer binder, POxaD. POxaVK electrodes prepared with the POxaD binder result in improved specific capacities, capacity retentions, and decreased resistance compared to those prepared with the canonical binder, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF). For example, the POxaVK cathode material with the POxaD binder gives a higher reversible capacity (101 mAh g–1 for POxaD binder vs 45 mA h g–1 for PVDF binder), improved capacity retention (88% vs 56%) and better zinc-ion diffusion (1.56 × 10–8 cm2 s–1 vs 1.09 × 10–9 cm2 s–1). These achievements can be ascribed to the better binding ability of the dopamine moieties of POxaD, thus resulting in overall improved structural integrity and conductivity compared to PVDF. This work highlights the potential of Vitamin K electrodes combined with a bioderived binder for improved performance relative to fluorinated binders.
Authors
- Alicia M. Battaglia
- Jiang Tian Liu
- Dwight S. Seferos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8742-8058)
- Eloi Grignon
Institutions
- University of Toronto (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
- Published
- 2025-06-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c10684
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Advanced battery technologies research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.73
Funders
- Ontario Research Foundation
- Canada Foundation for Innovation
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada