A Fox, a Few Chickens, a Theft

Abstract This article centers around a story about a fox who ate a few chickens in a town on the Nile Delta in Egypt, where the author conducts ethnographic fieldwork exploring home-based animal-rearing practices among women farmers. Neither the author nor their interlocutors witnessed this event: nobody saw the fox eating the chickens. The chickens were gone, but with no trace left behind. To find the culprit, the author's interlocutors sought divination with the help of a local religious authority. The article shares three stories about the same chain of events, featuring the perspective of three different interlocutors with varying stakes in the chickens’ disappearance. In juxtaposing these three stories, the author argues that the recognition of and engagement with nonhumans in our field sites necessitates reflecting on the limits of what we (can) know, how we know, unknowability, and the limitations of our social-scientific modes of knowing. Through bringing together multispecies ethnography and anthropologies of Islam, the author further argues that unknowability provides a possibility to revisit ethnographic praxis. If our interlocutors live with nonhumans, supernaturals, and God through uncertainty and unknowability, our ethnographic praxis must learn to attend to, think with, and make space for these factors in our ethnographic accounts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Studies of South Asia Africa and the Middle East
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/1089201x-11846286
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Fox, a Few Chickens, a Theft

Noha Fikry
Comparative Studies of South Asia Africa and the Middle East
Geographies of human-animal interactions
article

A Fox, a Few Chickens, a Theft

Noha Fikry
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article centers around a story about a fox who ate a few chickens in a town on the Nile Delta in Egypt, where the author conducts ethnographic fieldwork exploring home-based animal-rearing practices among women farmers. Neither the author nor their interlocutors witnessed this event: nobody saw the fox eating the chickens. The chickens were gone, but with no trace left behind. To find the culprit, the author's interlocutors sought divination with the help of a local religious authority. The article shares three stories about the same chain of events, featuring the perspective of three different interlocutors with varying stakes in the chickens’ disappearance. In juxtaposing these three stories, the author argues that the recognition of and engagement with nonhumans in our field sites necessitates reflecting on the limits of what we (can) know, how we know, unknowability, and the limitations of our social-scientific modes of knowing. Through bringing together multispecies ethnography and anthropologies of Islam, the author further argues that unknowability provides a possibility to revisit ethnographic praxis. If our interlocutors live with nonhumans, supernaturals, and God through uncertainty and unknowability, our ethnographic praxis must learn to attend to, think with, and make space for these factors in our ethnographic accounts.

Comparative Studies of South Asia Africa and the Middle EastVol. 45(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.