CKD Patients’ Emotional Well-Being: An Examination of Their Psychological Stressors and Support Factors

This study examined 112 CKD patients’ adherence to and satisfaction with treatment, and their quality of life, as mediated by the level of psychological stress experienced as well as their working alliance, resilience, and social support. The patients were receiving care at a public teaching hospital in the northeast region of the U.S. The results indicated a significant moderate negative correlation between psychological distress and quality of life (r = −0.34, p < 0.01). The results also indicated significant positive moderate to strong correlations between the physician–patient working alliance and adherence (r = 0.42, p < 0.001), satisfaction (r = 0.55, p < 0.001), and quality of life (r = 0.51, p < 0.001), between social support and quality of life (r = 0.39, p < 0.001), and significant moderate positive correlations between resilience and adherence (r = 0.35, p < 0.001) and satisfaction (r = 0.26, p < 0.01). Regression analyses indicated that the following predictors were significant: patient adherence was positively predicted by the working alliance (β = 0.42, p < 0.001); patient satisfaction was positively predicted by the working alliance (β = 0.51, p < 0.001) and negatively predicted by psychological distress (β = −18, p < 0.048); and quality of life was positively predicted by the working alliance (β = 0.38, p < 0.001) and social support (β = 0.28, p < 0.016) and negatively predicted by psychological distress (β = −0.34, p < 0.002). Moderation analyses indicated that the working alliance moderated the relationship between COVID impact and adherence (R2 = 0.27, F(df1, df2) = 8.36, p < 0.001, 95% CI = 0.29–2.74), social support moderated the relationship between COVID impact and adherence (R2 = 0.19, F(df1, df2) = 5.77, p < 0.001, 95% CI = 0.47–2.77), and resilient coping moderated the relationship between COVID impact and satisfaction (R2 = 0.20, F(df1, df2) = 7.89, p < 0.001, 95% CI = 0.94–2.81). The present study provides evidence of the significant role of psychological stressors and social support in influencing CKD patients’ adherence to and satisfaction with treatment, as well as their quality of life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kidney and Dialysis
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/kidneydial5020026
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CKD Patients’ Emotional Well-Being: An Examination of Their Psychological Stressors and Support Factors

Olivia Friedman, Sofia Rubinstein, Jairo N. Fuertes, Michael Moore
2 citations
Kidney and Dialysis
Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
3.09
article

CKD Patients’ Emotional Well-Being: An Examination of Their Psychological Stressors and Support Factors

Olivia Friedman, Sofia Rubinstein, Jairo N. Fuertes, Michael Moore
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study examined 112 CKD patients’ adherence to and satisfaction with treatment, and their quality of life, as mediated by the level of psychological stress experienced as well as their working alliance, resilience, and social support. The patients were receiving care at a public teaching hospital in the northeast region of the U.S. The results indicated a significant moderate negative correlation between psychological distress and quality of life (r = −0.34, p < 0.01). The results also indicated significant positive moderate to strong correlations between the physician–patient working alliance and adherence (r = 0.42, p < 0.001), satisfaction (r = 0.55, p < 0.001), and quality of life (r = 0.51, p < 0.001), between social support and quality of life (r = 0.39, p < 0.001), and significant moderate positive correlations between resilience and adherence (r = 0.35, p < 0.001) and satisfaction (r = 0.26, p < 0.01). Regression analyses indicated that the following predictors were significant: patient adherence was positively predicted by the working alliance (β = 0.42, p < 0.001); patient satisfaction was positively predicted by the working alliance (β = 0.51, p < 0.001) and negatively predicted by psychological distress (β = −18, p < 0.048); and quality of life was positively predicted by the working alliance (β = 0.38, p < 0.001) and social support (β = 0.28, p < 0.016) and negatively predicted by psychological distress (β = −0.34, p < 0.002). Moderation analyses indicated that the working alliance moderated the relationship between COVID impact and adherence (R2 = 0.27, F(df1, df2) = 8.36, p < 0.001, 95% CI = 0.29–2.74), social support moderated the relationship between COVID impact and adherence (R2 = 0.19, F(df1, df2) = 5.77, p < 0.001, 95% CI = 0.47–2.77), and resilient coping moderated the relationship between COVID impact and satisfaction (R2 = 0.20, F(df1, df2) = 7.89, p < 0.001, 95% CI = 0.94–2.81). The present study provides evidence of the significant role of psychological stressors and social support in influencing CKD patients’ adherence to and satisfaction with treatment, as well as their quality of life.

Kidney and DialysisVol. 5(2)
Nassau University Medical Center (US), Donald & Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell (US), Adelphi University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
3.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.