Discussing the potential consequences of a diagnostic label before routine non-cancer screening: qualitative study with general practitioners and consumers
The practice and perceived value of discussing diagnostic labelling consequences were recognised as important by both GPs and consumers. However, preferences regarding the content of discussions and whether these occurred in clinical encounters before or after screening varied.
Authors
- Paul Glasziou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7564-073X)
- Rebecca Sims (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1604-8354)
- Rae Thomas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2165-5917)
- Zoe A Michaleff (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0360-4956)
Institutions
- Bond University (AU)
- Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine (AU)
- Northern Sydney Local Health District (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BJPsych Open
- Published
- 2025-06-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.5
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.88
Funders
- Australian Government
- National Health and Medical Research Council