ChatGPT in Research and Education: A SWOT Analysis of Its Academic Impact

Advanced artificial intelligence technologies such as ChatGPT and other large language models (LLMs) have significantly impacted fields such as education and research in recent years. ChatGPT benefits students and educators by providing personalized feedback, facilitating interactive learning, and introducing innovative teaching methods. While many researchers have studied ChatGPT across various subject domains, few analyses have focused on the engineering domain, particularly in addressing the risks of academic dishonesty and potential declines in critical thinking skills. To address this gap, this study explores both the opportunities and limitations of ChatGPT in engineering contexts through a two-part analysis. First, we conducted experiments with ChatGPT to assess its effectiveness in tasks such as code generation, error checking, and solution optimization. Second, we surveyed 125 users, predominantly engineering students, to analyze ChatGPTs role in academic support. Our findings reveal that 93.60% of respondents use ChatGPT for quick academic answers, particularly among early-stage university students, and that 84.00% find it helpful for sourcing research materials. The study also highlights ChatGPT’s strengths in programming assistance, with 84.80% of users utilizing it for debugging and 86.40% for solving coding problems. However, limitations persist, with many users reporting inaccuracies in mathematical solutions and occasional false citations. Furthermore, the reliance on the free version by 96% of users underscores its accessibility but also suggests limitations in resource availability. This work provides key insights into ChatGPT’s strengths and limitations, establishing a framework for responsible AI use in education. Highlighting areas for improvement marks a milestone in understanding and optimizing AI’s role in academia for sustainable future use.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2025.064168
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ChatGPT in Research and Education: A SWOT Analysis of Its Academic Impact

Jungpil Shin, Md. Ekramul Hamid, Md Abdur Rahim, Md Moazzem Hossain et al.
2 citations
Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.31
article

ChatGPT in Research and Education: A SWOT Analysis of Its Academic Impact

Jungpil Shin, Md. Ekramul Hamid, Md Abdur Rahim, Md Moazzem Hossain, Md. Mahbubur Rahman Tusher, Md. Saiful Islam, Md Mamun Hossain, Abu Saleh Musa Miah
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Advanced artificial intelligence technologies such as ChatGPT and other large language models (LLMs) have significantly impacted fields such as education and research in recent years. ChatGPT benefits students and educators by providing personalized feedback, facilitating interactive learning, and introducing innovative teaching methods. While many researchers have studied ChatGPT across various subject domains, few analyses have focused on the engineering domain, particularly in addressing the risks of academic dishonesty and potential declines in critical thinking skills. To address this gap, this study explores both the opportunities and limitations of ChatGPT in engineering contexts through a two-part analysis. First, we conducted experiments with ChatGPT to assess its effectiveness in tasks such as code generation, error checking, and solution optimization. Second, we surveyed 125 users, predominantly engineering students, to analyze ChatGPTs role in academic support. Our findings reveal that 93.60% of respondents use ChatGPT for quick academic answers, particularly among early-stage university students, and that 84.00% find it helpful for sourcing research materials. The study also highlights ChatGPT’s strengths in programming assistance, with 84.80% of users utilizing it for debugging and 86.40% for solving coding problems. However, limitations persist, with many users reporting inaccuracies in mathematical solutions and occasional false citations. Furthermore, the reliance on the free version by 96% of users underscores its accessibility but also suggests limitations in resource availability. This work provides key insights into ChatGPT’s strengths and limitations, establishing a framework for responsible AI use in education. Highlighting areas for improvement marks a milestone in understanding and optimizing AI’s role in academia for sustainable future use.

Computer Modeling in Engineering & SciencesVol. 143(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.