ДА ЛИ ЈЕ ПРАВДА ПРИВИЛЕГИЈА (САМО) РАЗВИЈЕНИХ ДРУШТАВА? ЈАВНЕ УСЛУГЕ КАО ФАКТОР ДОСТУПНОСТИ ПРАВДЕ ЗА ГРАЂАНЕ И ДРУШТВЕНОГ РАЗВОЈА

This article examines the fundamental question of whether access to justice is structurally tied to conditions that predominantly exist in developed societies. While justice is proclaimed as a universal human right, its realization is often hindered by state capacity, public infrastructure, and the quality of public administration. The paper argues that justice cannot be separated from the material and institutional context in which it operates. Rather than viewing justice solely through legal formalism, the article frames it as a developmental issue - one that is enabled or obstructed by the availability of essential public services. Drawing on theoretical perspectives from Amartya Sen, John Rawls, and legal empowerment frameworks, the author situates justice within broader concepts of social investment and inclusive development. Public services such as civil registration, legal aid, transport, digital access, and education are presented not as auxiliary supports but as core elements enabling effective legal protection. Through comparative case studies including Rwanda's Gacaca courts, Brazil’s mobile judicial units, and Estonia’s fully digital legal system - the paper illustrates diverse policy innovations that have successfully expanded justice access in resource-constrained settings. The analysis identifies major structural barriers to justice - lack of legal identity, geographic isolation, legal illiteracy, overburdened court systems, and digital exclusion. It proposes five policy levers to bridge these gaps: community-based legal aid, infrastructure expansion, digital inclusion strategies, legal literacy initiatives, and cross-sectoral policy integration. In conclusion, the author advocates for a shift in development metrics to treat justice as a central indicator, measured not just by institutional presence but by real-world accessibility, legal awareness, and equality of outcomes. The paper calls for justice to be recognized and resourced as a public good, essential to sustainable and inclusive development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Prištini
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63177/mns.2025.08
Primary Topic
Law in Society and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ДА ЛИ ЈЕ ПРАВДА ПРИВИЛЕГИЈА (САМО) РАЗВИЈЕНИХ ДРУШТАВА? ЈАВНЕ УСЛУГЕ КАО ФАКТОР ДОСТУПНОСТИ ПРАВДЕ ЗА ГРАЂАНЕ И ДРУШТВЕНОГ РАЗВОЈА

Veran Stančetić
Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Prištini
Law in Society and Culture
article

ДА ЛИ ЈЕ ПРАВДА ПРИВИЛЕГИЈА (САМО) РАЗВИЈЕНИХ ДРУШТАВА? ЈАВНЕ УСЛУГЕ КАО ФАКТОР ДОСТУПНОСТИ ПРАВДЕ ЗА ГРАЂАНЕ И ДРУШТВЕНОГ РАЗВОЈА

Veran Stančetić
article en

Abstract

This article examines the fundamental question of whether access to justice is structurally tied to conditions that predominantly exist in developed societies. While justice is proclaimed as a universal human right, its realization is often hindered by state capacity, public infrastructure, and the quality of public administration. The paper argues that justice cannot be separated from the material and institutional context in which it operates. Rather than viewing justice solely through legal formalism, the article frames it as a developmental issue - one that is enabled or obstructed by the availability of essential public services. Drawing on theoretical perspectives from Amartya Sen, John Rawls, and legal empowerment frameworks, the author situates justice within broader concepts of social investment and inclusive development. Public services such as civil registration, legal aid, transport, digital access, and education are presented not as auxiliary supports but as core elements enabling effective legal protection. Through comparative case studies including Rwanda's Gacaca courts, Brazil’s mobile judicial units, and Estonia’s fully digital legal system - the paper illustrates diverse policy innovations that have successfully expanded justice access in resource-constrained settings. The analysis identifies major structural barriers to justice - lack of legal identity, geographic isolation, legal illiteracy, overburdened court systems, and digital exclusion. It proposes five policy levers to bridge these gaps: community-based legal aid, infrastructure expansion, digital inclusion strategies, legal literacy initiatives, and cross-sectoral policy integration. In conclusion, the author advocates for a shift in development metrics to treat justice as a central indicator, measured not just by institutional presence but by real-world accessibility, legal awareness, and equality of outcomes. The paper calls for justice to be recognized and resourced as a public good, essential to sustainable and inclusive development.

Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Prištini
University of Belgrade (RS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Law in Society and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.