Discrepancies in qPCR-based gene quantification and their dependencies on soil properties, inhibitor presence, and DNA extraction kit types

The complexity and heterogeneity of soil samples necessitate the inclusion of extensive purification steps prior to genomic assays, such as quantitative PCR (qPCR). Although conventional DNA extraction kits have notably enhanced the convenience of the process, those designed for soil vary considerably in terms of reagents, time, and equipment. Therefore, purified gDNA quality varies depending on the DNA extraction kits used, which leads to discrepancies in gene quantification using qPCR. This issue can be amplified considerably when more complicated (or contaminated) soils are analyzed, even if extensive DNA extraction is employed. Here, we evaluated the influences of the DNA extraction method to the gene quantification using qPCR across soil types. Further Mg<sup>2+</sup> ion spiking experiments were performed to observe multiple inhibitory effects on qPCR analysis performance. The results suggest that discrepancies in gene quantification are evident in the presence of qPCR inhibitors in soil samples. Furthermore, discrepancies in quantification results are exacerbated by gDNA template quality, which is attributed to DNA extraction. The observed multiple inhibitory effects underscore the importance of careful consideration of both DNA template quality and soil type to ensure more accurate gene quantification in soils.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
RSC Advances
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1039/d5ra02689j
Primary Topic
Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discrepancies in qPCR-based gene quantification and their dependencies on soil properties, inhibitor presence, and DNA extraction kit types

Eun Hye Lee, Ahjeong Son, Hyun Jeong Lim
RSC Advances
Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
article

Discrepancies in qPCR-based gene quantification and their dependencies on soil properties, inhibitor presence, and DNA extraction kit types

Eun Hye Lee, Ahjeong Son, Hyun Jeong Lim
article en

Abstract

The complexity and heterogeneity of soil samples necessitate the inclusion of extensive purification steps prior to genomic assays, such as quantitative PCR (qPCR). Although conventional DNA extraction kits have notably enhanced the convenience of the process, those designed for soil vary considerably in terms of reagents, time, and equipment. Therefore, purified gDNA quality varies depending on the DNA extraction kits used, which leads to discrepancies in gene quantification using qPCR. This issue can be amplified considerably when more complicated (or contaminated) soils are analyzed, even if extensive DNA extraction is employed. Here, we evaluated the influences of the DNA extraction method to the gene quantification using qPCR across soil types. Further Mg<sup>2+</sup> ion spiking experiments were performed to observe multiple inhibitory effects on qPCR analysis performance. The results suggest that discrepancies in gene quantification are evident in the presence of qPCR inhibitors in soil samples. Furthermore, discrepancies in quantification results are exacerbated by gDNA template quality, which is attributed to DNA extraction. The observed multiple inhibitory effects underscore the importance of careful consideration of both DNA template quality and soil type to ensure more accurate gene quantification in soils.

RSC AdvancesVol. 15(25)
Ewha Womans University (KR)
National Research Foundation, National Research Foundation of Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.