Assessment of Visual Function in Patients Undergoing Prone Positioning for COVID-19-Related ARDS: A Qualitative Observational Study

Background/Objectives: Prone positioning is a key strategy to improve oxygenation in ARDS patients, particularly used during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, its impact on visual function remains poorly investigated. This study assesses the effect of prone positioning on self-perceived visual acuity and functional vision in ARDS patients after ICU discharge. Methods: A single-center observational study was conducted at Santo Stefano Hospital (Prato, Italy) from March 2020 to April 2023. We included adult COVID-19 ARDS patients, ventilated invasively, and subjected to at least one prone positioning cycle. Patients with pre-existing visual disorders were excluded. Visual function was evaluated through the CATQUEST-9SF questionnaire administered via telephone follow-up. Rasch analysis was applied to generate a linear visual function scale. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of reduced visual function. Results: Out of 300 ICU admissions, 182 met the inclusion criteria, and 39 completed the follow-up. Older age (OR 1.148, p < 0.05), female sex (OR 0.066, p < 0.05), and increased number of prone cycles (OR 3.576, p < 0.05) were significantly associated with reduced visual function. The model’s predictive performance was excellent (AUC = 0.8997). Conclusions: Prone positioning improves respiratory outcomes but may have unintended visual consequences. Monitoring visual function should be integrated into ICU follow-up programs to mitigate long-term visual impairment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anesthesia Research
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/anesthres2020014
Primary Topic
Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Visual Function in Patients Undergoing Prone Positioning for COVID-19-Related ARDS: A Qualitative Observational Study

Vittorio Pavoni, Iacopo Cappellini, Federico Scandagli, Laura Vannucci et al.
Anesthesia Research
Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
article

Assessment of Visual Function in Patients Undergoing Prone Positioning for COVID-19-Related ARDS: A Qualitative Observational Study

Vittorio Pavoni, Iacopo Cappellini, Federico Scandagli, Laura Vannucci, Elena Schirru
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Prone positioning is a key strategy to improve oxygenation in ARDS patients, particularly used during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, its impact on visual function remains poorly investigated. This study assesses the effect of prone positioning on self-perceived visual acuity and functional vision in ARDS patients after ICU discharge. Methods: A single-center observational study was conducted at Santo Stefano Hospital (Prato, Italy) from March 2020 to April 2023. We included adult COVID-19 ARDS patients, ventilated invasively, and subjected to at least one prone positioning cycle. Patients with pre-existing visual disorders were excluded. Visual function was evaluated through the CATQUEST-9SF questionnaire administered via telephone follow-up. Rasch analysis was applied to generate a linear visual function scale. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of reduced visual function. Results: Out of 300 ICU admissions, 182 met the inclusion criteria, and 39 completed the follow-up. Older age (OR 1.148, p < 0.05), female sex (OR 0.066, p < 0.05), and increased number of prone cycles (OR 3.576, p < 0.05) were significantly associated with reduced visual function. The model’s predictive performance was excellent (AUC = 0.8997). Conclusions: Prone positioning improves respiratory outcomes but may have unintended visual consequences. Monitoring visual function should be integrated into ICU follow-up programs to mitigate long-term visual impairment.

Anesthesia ResearchVol. 2(2)
Azienda Usl Toscana Centro (IT)
Regione Toscana
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.