Optimizing Management of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) Nitrogen Fertilizer Based on Critical Nitrogen Concentration Dilution Curve Model

The critical nitrogen dilution curve (CNDC) model enables precise nitrogen management by quantifying the threshold of nitrogen deficiency in crops, thereby enhancing both crop productivity and nitrogen use efficiency. However, its applicability to perennial crops remains unclear. In this study, alfalfa (<i>Medicago sativa</i> L.), a perennial leguminous forage, was used as the model crop. Based on two years of field experiments, CNDC models of aboveground biomass were constructed under two nitrogen fertilizer regimes: urea (0, 80, 160, and 240 kg·ha<sup>-1</sup>, applied in a 6:2:2 basal-to-topdressing ratio) and controlled-release urea (CRU; 0, 80, 160, and 240 kg·ha<sup>-1</sup>, applied as a single basal dose). Using these models, the nitrogen nutrition index (NNI) and cumulative nitrogen deficit (N<sub>and</sub>) models were developed to diagnose alfalfa nitrogen status, and the optimal nitrogen application rates were determined via regression analysis. The results showed that critical nitrogen concentration and aboveground biomass followed a power function relationship under both fertilizer types. For CRU treatments, parameters a and b were 3.41 and 0.20 (first cut), 3.15 and 0.12 (second cut), and 2.24 and 0.40 (third cut), respectively. For urea treatments, a and b were 3.13 and 0.35 (first cut), 2.21 and 0.16 (second cut), and 1.75 and 0.73 (third cut). The normalized root mean square error (n-RMSE) of the models ranged from 3.1% to 13%, indicating high model reliability. Based on the NNI, N<sub>and</sub>, and yield response models, the optimal nitrogen application rates were 175.44~181.71 kg·ha<sup>-1</sup> for urea and 145.63~153.46 kg·ha<sup>-1</sup> for CRU, corresponding to theoretical maximum yields of 14.76~17.40 t·ha<sup>-1</sup> and 16.76~20.66 t·ha<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. Compared to urea, CRU reduced nitrogen input by 18.41~20.47% while achieving equivalent or higher theoretical yields. This study provides a scientific basis for nitrogen status diagnosis and precision nitrogen application in alfalfa cultivation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plants
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14121782
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Management of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) Nitrogen Fertilizer Based on Critical Nitrogen Concentration Dilution Curve Model

G. Shen, Minhua Yin, Guangping Qi, Haiyan Li et al.
1 citations
Plants
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
1.90
article

Optimizing Management of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) Nitrogen Fertilizer Based on Critical Nitrogen Concentration Dilution Curve Model

G. Shen, Minhua Yin, Guangping Qi, Haiyan Li, Yanlin Ma, Jiandong Lu, Yi Ling, W. L. Chang, Yanxia Kang, Yaya Duan, Yayu Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The critical nitrogen dilution curve (CNDC) model enables precise nitrogen management by quantifying the threshold of nitrogen deficiency in crops, thereby enhancing both crop productivity and nitrogen use efficiency. However, its applicability to perennial crops remains unclear. In this study, alfalfa (<i>Medicago sativa</i> L.), a perennial leguminous forage, was used as the model crop. Based on two years of field experiments, CNDC models of aboveground biomass were constructed under two nitrogen fertilizer regimes: urea (0, 80, 160, and 240 kg·ha<sup>-1</sup>, applied in a 6:2:2 basal-to-topdressing ratio) and controlled-release urea (CRU; 0, 80, 160, and 240 kg·ha<sup>-1</sup>, applied as a single basal dose). Using these models, the nitrogen nutrition index (NNI) and cumulative nitrogen deficit (N<sub>and</sub>) models were developed to diagnose alfalfa nitrogen status, and the optimal nitrogen application rates were determined via regression analysis. The results showed that critical nitrogen concentration and aboveground biomass followed a power function relationship under both fertilizer types. For CRU treatments, parameters a and b were 3.41 and 0.20 (first cut), 3.15 and 0.12 (second cut), and 2.24 and 0.40 (third cut), respectively. For urea treatments, a and b were 3.13 and 0.35 (first cut), 2.21 and 0.16 (second cut), and 1.75 and 0.73 (third cut). The normalized root mean square error (n-RMSE) of the models ranged from 3.1% to 13%, indicating high model reliability. Based on the NNI, N<sub>and</sub>, and yield response models, the optimal nitrogen application rates were 175.44~181.71 kg·ha<sup>-1</sup> for urea and 145.63~153.46 kg·ha<sup>-1</sup> for CRU, corresponding to theoretical maximum yields of 14.76~17.40 t·ha<sup>-1</sup> and 16.76~20.66 t·ha<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. Compared to urea, CRU reduced nitrogen input by 18.41~20.47% while achieving equivalent or higher theoretical yields. This study provides a scientific basis for nitrogen status diagnosis and precision nitrogen application in alfalfa cultivation.

PlantsVol. 14(12)
Gansu Agricultural University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Gansu Agricultural University
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
1.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.