Climate Communication in the Hybrid Media System: Media and Stakeholder Logics on Social Media

Climate change is a major political challenge affecting millions of people worldwide. Journalists—while following media logic—have a strong responsibility to inform the public of the scientific evidence on the causes and consequences of climate change and to explain the motivations driving the climate policies under discussion. However, within hybrid media systems, journalists increasingly compete for attention with climate stakeholders, who tend to follow a political logic in climate communication and bypass journalism to share their perspectives on climate change. Despite this dynamic, the extent to which the climate communication of media organizations and stakeholders diverges in terms of content and focus remains largely unexplored, as does whether their topics and communication styles show signs of convergence. This article addresses these gaps by comparing how journalistic media and climate stakeholders communicate about climate change on social media and by examining the user engagement their content creates. We conducted a manual quantitative content analysis of visual posts about climate change published by media organizations and climate stakeholders in Germany on Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, and YouTube during the 2023 UN Climate Change Conference in Dubai (<em>N</em> = 1,050). The results deepen our understanding of the national climate discourse in Germany and show that journalistic content in climate communication adheres strongly to media logic, presenting climate change in a more event-oriented, personalized, and negative manner. However, climate stakeholders’ communication is characterized by political logic, using strategic framing and focusing less on current climate events.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Media and Communication
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.9892
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate Communication in the Hybrid Media System: Media and Stakeholder Logics on Social Media

Nadezhda Ozornina, Mario Haim, Jörg Haßler, Simon M. Luebke
5 citations
Media and Communication
Media Studies and Communication
19.32
article

Climate Communication in the Hybrid Media System: Media and Stakeholder Logics on Social Media

Nadezhda Ozornina, Mario Haim, Jörg Haßler, Simon M. Luebke
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Climate change is a major political challenge affecting millions of people worldwide. Journalists—while following media logic—have a strong responsibility to inform the public of the scientific evidence on the causes and consequences of climate change and to explain the motivations driving the climate policies under discussion. However, within hybrid media systems, journalists increasingly compete for attention with climate stakeholders, who tend to follow a political logic in climate communication and bypass journalism to share their perspectives on climate change. Despite this dynamic, the extent to which the climate communication of media organizations and stakeholders diverges in terms of content and focus remains largely unexplored, as does whether their topics and communication styles show signs of convergence. This article addresses these gaps by comparing how journalistic media and climate stakeholders communicate about climate change on social media and by examining the user engagement their content creates. We conducted a manual quantitative content analysis of visual posts about climate change published by media organizations and climate stakeholders in Germany on Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, and YouTube during the 2023 UN Climate Change Conference in Dubai (<em>N</em> = 1,050). The results deepen our understanding of the national climate discourse in Germany and show that journalistic content in climate communication adheres strongly to media logic, presenting climate change in a more event-oriented, personalized, and negative manner. However, climate stakeholders’ communication is characterized by political logic, using strategic framing and focusing less on current climate events.

Media and CommunicationVol. 13
Pohang University of Science and Technology (KR), Dart Center for Journalism and Trauma (US), Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
National Research Foundation, Korea Health Industry Development Institute, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Media Studies and Communication
19.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.