Sustainability Evaluation of Robusta Coffee Farming in Malinau Regency Using the Sustainable Livelihood Framework

Robusta coffee cultivation in Malinau Regency has been increasingly associated with forest land conversion, thereby intensifying the need for sustainable management practices that align with both environmental conservation and rural livelihood enhancement.To evaluate the sustainability of Robusta coffee farming systems, the sustainable livelihood framework was applied, focusing on five key livelihood capitals: natural, human, social, physical, and financial.A mixed-methods approach involving Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) and thematic analysis was employed to quantify sustainability levels and identify leverage points for strategic intervention.Results indicated that most capitals were classified as either "unsustainable" or "less sustainable."Social capital demonstrated the lowest performance, with an index of 15.10, while financial capital followed at 20.88; both were categorized as "unsustainable."Natural capital (26.13) and human capital (26.09) were deemed "less sustainable," whereas physical capital showed relatively higher resilience with an index of 46.61, though still within the "less sustainable" threshold.Key constraints included insecure land tenure, underdeveloped infrastructure, limited social cohesion, and economic dependence on non-coffee income sources.Strategic interventions were proposed, including the certification of land ownership for 70% of coffee farmers within three years, the revitalization of farmer cooperatives to improve social capital, and the enhancement of rural infrastructure, particularly targeting 85% electricity coverage in coffee-producing areas by the second year.The integration of Geographical Indication (GI) certification with agroforestry-based production systems was identified as a pivotal strategy to reconcile ecological integrity with market competitiveness.By year four, price premiums of up to 40% in domestic markets and 60% in international markets were targeted through value addition and branding.These integrated measures are expected to reinforce livelihood resilience while promoting long-term socio-ecological sustainability in Malinau's coffee landscapes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Organic Farming
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56578/of110201
Primary Topic
Agricultural Development and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainability Evaluation of Robusta Coffee Farming in Malinau Regency Using the Sustainable Livelihood Framework

Devi Maulida Rahmah, Tjahjo Tri Hartono, Deny Titing, Adi Sutrisno et al.
2 links
Organic Farming
Agricultural Development and Management
article

Sustainability Evaluation of Robusta Coffee Farming in Malinau Regency Using the Sustainable Livelihood Framework

Devi Maulida Rahmah, Tjahjo Tri Hartono, Deny Titing, Adi Sutrisno, MW Agang, Dwi Budi Santoso, Etty Wahyuni, Rahmat Pramulya, Erwan Kusnadi, Mas Davino Sayaza, Elida Novita
article en

Abstract

Robusta coffee cultivation in Malinau Regency has been increasingly associated with forest land conversion, thereby intensifying the need for sustainable management practices that align with both environmental conservation and rural livelihood enhancement.To evaluate the sustainability of Robusta coffee farming systems, the sustainable livelihood framework was applied, focusing on five key livelihood capitals: natural, human, social, physical, and financial.A mixed-methods approach involving Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) and thematic analysis was employed to quantify sustainability levels and identify leverage points for strategic intervention.Results indicated that most capitals were classified as either "unsustainable" or "less sustainable."Social capital demonstrated the lowest performance, with an index of 15.10, while financial capital followed at 20.88; both were categorized as "unsustainable."Natural capital (26.13) and human capital (26.09) were deemed "less sustainable," whereas physical capital showed relatively higher resilience with an index of 46.61, though still within the "less sustainable" threshold.Key constraints included insecure land tenure, underdeveloped infrastructure, limited social cohesion, and economic dependence on non-coffee income sources.Strategic interventions were proposed, including the certification of land ownership for 70% of coffee farmers within three years, the revitalization of farmer cooperatives to improve social capital, and the enhancement of rural infrastructure, particularly targeting 85% electricity coverage in coffee-producing areas by the second year.The integration of Geographical Indication (GI) certification with agroforestry-based production systems was identified as a pivotal strategy to reconcile ecological integrity with market competitiveness.By year four, price premiums of up to 40% in domestic markets and 60% in international markets were targeted through value addition and branding.These integrated measures are expected to reinforce livelihood resilience while promoting long-term socio-ecological sustainability in Malinau's coffee landscapes.

Organic FarmingVol. 11(2)
Bureau of Planning and International Cooperation, Ministry of National Education
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Agricultural Development and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.