Thumb on the Political Scale: Election Law in the Era of “Judicial Supremacy”

Over the past 20 years (since Bush v. Gore at least), voting rights have been at the heart of a major partisan battle. As of late, the “Voting Wars” described by Rick Hasen have not abated.1 The courts have been at the center of these voting wars as the appointment of conservative activist judges has been not only a goal of the GOP but the main political prize. Since the Voting Rights Act was severely weakened by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2013, Congress has been incapable of passing new legislation protecting the right to vote (such as the proposed John Lewis Amendment). With Congress in what seems to be a state of constant crisis, there is no check on the court’s ability to shape election law to favor the conservative agenda. Navigating these muddy waters has been particularly challenging for proponents of voting rights. If the American representative democracy is in crisis, one of its distinctive characteristics is the role played by the courts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Siècles
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4000/1435w
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thumb on the Political Scale: Election Law in the Era of “Judicial Supremacy”

Olivier Richomme
Siècles
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
article

Thumb on the Political Scale: Election Law in the Era of “Judicial Supremacy”

Olivier Richomme
article en

Abstract

Over the past 20 years (since Bush v. Gore at least), voting rights have been at the heart of a major partisan battle. As of late, the “Voting Wars” described by Rick Hasen have not abated.1 The courts have been at the center of these voting wars as the appointment of conservative activist judges has been not only a goal of the GOP but the main political prize. Since the Voting Rights Act was severely weakened by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2013, Congress has been incapable of passing new legislation protecting the right to vote (such as the proposed John Lewis Amendment). With Congress in what seems to be a state of constant crisis, there is no check on the court’s ability to shape election law to favor the conservative agenda. Navigating these muddy waters has been particularly challenging for proponents of voting rights. If the American representative democracy is in crisis, one of its distinctive characteristics is the role played by the courts.

SièclesVol. 58
United States Department of Justice (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.