Konsekwencje uchwały Sejmu z 6 marca 2024 r. w sprawie usunięcia skutków kryzysu konstytucyjnego lat 2015–2023 w kontekście działalności Trybunału Konstytucyjnego

The views expressed in the analysed Resolution of the Sejm, relating to the definition of the actual legal state of affairs with regard to the activities of the Constitutional Tribunal, combined with the appeal and the declaration of the House, are not legally binding on other organs of the State, although they may constitute non-binding guidelines for them. The effect of the position expressed should be, first and foremost, to refrain from electing a successor when the term of office of a judge of the Constitutional Tribunal expires. Other effects of the Sejm’s Resolution on the relationship of the Sejm and the Marshal of the Sejm with the Constitutional Tribunal and its President are also discussed.