Mortality Risk Assessment Using PRECISE-DAPT and DAPT Scores in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Comparative Analysis

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the data on mortality of the clinical scoring system that predicts the risk of ischemia-bleeding under dual therapy. Materials and Methods:The records of the patients were retrospectively examined through the hospital information system and archival records.The prepared case data registration form and the Morisky Medication Adherence scale drug compliance scale were filled out.With these data, the patients' predicting bleeding complications in Patients Undergoing Stent Implantation and Subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) and DAPT scores were calculated.Results: A total of 260 patients were included in the study.The PRECISE-DAPT and DAPT scores were calculated for the patients with acute coronary syndrome.A total of 62 patients (23.8%), exhibited a PRECISE-DAPT score of 25.The number of patients with a DAPT score 2 was found to be 193 (74.2%).In terms of mortality, patients with PRECISE-DAPT 25 and those with PRECISE-DAPT <25 were compared with another group (score should be specified here), and mortality was significantly higher in the high-score group [p=0.001odds ratio: 6.94 confidence interval: (3.53-13.62)].Patients were divided into 4 groups based on PRECISE-DAPT and DAPT scores and compared with each other (PRECISE-

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Updates in Cardiovascular Medicine
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32596/jucvm.galenos.2025.2024-42-114
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mortality Risk Assessment Using PRECISE-DAPT and DAPT Scores in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Comparative Analysis

Nezihi Barış, Ebru Özpelit, Mohammed Abusharekh, Çetin Alak
Journal of Updates in Cardiovascular Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
article

Mortality Risk Assessment Using PRECISE-DAPT and DAPT Scores in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Comparative Analysis

Nezihi Barış, Ebru Özpelit, Mohammed Abusharekh, Çetin Alak
article en

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the data on mortality of the clinical scoring system that predicts the risk of ischemia-bleeding under dual therapy. Materials and Methods:The records of the patients were retrospectively examined through the hospital information system and archival records.The prepared case data registration form and the Morisky Medication Adherence scale drug compliance scale were filled out.With these data, the patients' predicting bleeding complications in Patients Undergoing Stent Implantation and Subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) and DAPT scores were calculated.Results: A total of 260 patients were included in the study.The PRECISE-DAPT and DAPT scores were calculated for the patients with acute coronary syndrome.A total of 62 patients (23.8%), exhibited a PRECISE-DAPT score of 25.The number of patients with a DAPT score 2 was found to be 193 (74.2%).In terms of mortality, patients with PRECISE-DAPT 25 and those with PRECISE-DAPT <25 were compared with another group (score should be specified here), and mortality was significantly higher in the high-score group [p=0.001odds ratio: 6.94 confidence interval: (3.53-13.62)].Patients were divided into 4 groups based on PRECISE-DAPT and DAPT scores and compared with each other (PRECISE-

Journal of Updates in Cardiovascular MedicineVol. 13(2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.