Performance of quantum annealing for 2-satisfiability problems with multiple satisfying assignments

Using a specially constructed set of hard 2-satisfiability problems with four satisfying assignments, we study the scaling and sampling performance of numerical simulation of quantum annealing as well as that of the physical quantum annealers offered by D-Wave. To this end, we use both the standard quantum annealing and reverse annealing protocols in both our simulations and on the D-Wave quantum annealer. In the case of ideal quantum annealing the sampling behavior can be explained by perturbation theory and the scaling behavior of the time to solution depends on the scaling behavior of the minimum energy gap between the ground state and the first-excited state of the annealing Hamiltonian. The corresponding results from the D-Wave quantum annealers do not fit to this ideal picture, but suggest that the scaling of the time to solution from the quantum annealers matches those calculated from the equilibrium probability distribution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. A/Physical review, A
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/n7r5-s63q
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of quantum annealing for 2-satisfiability problems with multiple satisfying assignments

Kristel Michielsen, Hans De Raedt, Fengping Jin, Karl J. Friston
2 citations
Physical review. A/Physical review, A
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
4.21
article

Performance of quantum annealing for 2-satisfiability problems with multiple satisfying assignments

Kristel Michielsen, Hans De Raedt, Fengping Jin, Karl J. Friston
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Using a specially constructed set of hard 2-satisfiability problems with four satisfying assignments, we study the scaling and sampling performance of numerical simulation of quantum annealing as well as that of the physical quantum annealers offered by D-Wave. To this end, we use both the standard quantum annealing and reverse annealing protocols in both our simulations and on the D-Wave quantum annealer. In the case of ideal quantum annealing the sampling behavior can be explained by perturbation theory and the scaling behavior of the time to solution depends on the scaling behavior of the minimum energy gap between the ground state and the first-excited state of the annealing Hamiltonian. The corresponding results from the D-Wave quantum annealers do not fit to this ideal picture, but suggest that the scaling of the time to solution from the quantum annealers matches those calculated from the equilibrium probability distribution.

Physical review. A/Physical review, AVol. 112(1)
Adidas (Canada) (CA), Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
4.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Performance of quantum annealing for 2-satisfiability problems with multiple satisfying assignments — Kristel Michielsen, Hans De Raedt, et al. · Physical review. A/Physical review, A (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS