Brain-Computer Interface tool use and the Contemplation Conundrum: a blueprint of mental action, agency, and control

This paper approaches the role of intentional action in brain-computer interface (BCI) tool use to allow for an ethical discourse regarding the development and usage of neurotechnology. The exploration of mental actions and user control in BCI tool use brings us closer to understanding the philosophical underpinnings of intentions and agency for BCI-mediated actions. The author presents that under some theories of intentional action, certain BCI-mediated overt movements qualify as both voluntary and unintentional. This plausibly magnifies the ethical considerations surrounding BCI tool use. This problem is referred by the author as the contemplation conundrum. Thus, the paper proposes research scope for the neural correlates of intention formation and the neural correlates of imagination aimed at clarifying implementational control and safeguarding privacy of thought in BCI tool use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oxford Open Neuroscience
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/oons/kvaf002
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Brain-Computer Interface tool use and the Contemplation Conundrum: a blueprint of mental action, agency, and control

Dhagash Mehta
Oxford Open Neuroscience
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
article

Brain-Computer Interface tool use and the Contemplation Conundrum: a blueprint of mental action, agency, and control

Dhagash Mehta
article en

Abstract

This paper approaches the role of intentional action in brain-computer interface (BCI) tool use to allow for an ethical discourse regarding the development and usage of neurotechnology. The exploration of mental actions and user control in BCI tool use brings us closer to understanding the philosophical underpinnings of intentions and agency for BCI-mediated actions. The author presents that under some theories of intentional action, certain BCI-mediated overt movements qualify as both voluntary and unintentional. This plausibly magnifies the ethical considerations surrounding BCI tool use. This problem is referred by the author as the contemplation conundrum. Thus, the paper proposes research scope for the neural correlates of intention formation and the neural correlates of imagination aimed at clarifying implementational control and safeguarding privacy of thought in BCI tool use.

Oxford Open NeuroscienceVol. 4
The King's College (US), University of Cambridge (GB), King's College Hospital (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Brain-Computer Interface tool use and the Contemplation Conundrum: a blueprint of mental action, agency, and control — Dhagash Mehta · Oxford Open Neuroscience (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS