Early Cretaceous Zn-Pb (Ba±Ag±Cu±Fe±Mn) Deposits of Iran: Irish Type or Mississippi Valley Type? Reply to Nejadhadad et al. Comment on “Rajabi et al. Barite Replacement as a Key Factor in the Genesis of Sediment-Hosted Zn-Pb±Ba and Barite-Sulfide Dep

This study critically examines the early Cretaceous carbonate-hosted Zn-Pb (±Ba±Cu) deposits of the Malayer-Esfahan (MEMB) and Yazd-Anarak (YAMB) metallogenic belts in Iran, which have been inaccurately classified as Mississippi Valley type (MVT) deposits by Nejadhadad et al. (2025). Our findings reveal significant differences in mineralogy, fluid inclusion characteristics, and geochemical signatures compared to typical MVT deposits. These deposits are more akin to Irish-type Zn-Pb mineralization and formed in extensional and passive margin environments around the Nain–Baft back-arc basin. The normal faults in this back-arc rift can transform significantly during inversion and compressional tectonics, reactivating to behave as reverse faults and leading to new geological structures and landscapes. Our study highlights barite replacement as a crucial factor in forming sediment-hosted Zn-Pb (±Ba±Cu) and barite-sulfide deposits. Based on textural evidence, fluid inclusion data, and sulfur isotope analyses, we propose that barite plays a fundamental role in controlling subsequent Zn-Pb (±Ba±Cu) mineralization by serving as both a favorable host and a significant sulfur source. Furthermore, diagenetic barite may act as a precursor to diverse types of sediment-hosted Zn-Pb (±Ba±Cu) mineralization, refining genetic models for these deposits. Sulfur isotope analyses of Irish-type deposits show a broad δ34S range (−28‰ to +5‰), indicative of bacterial sulfate reduction (BSR). Nevertheless, more positive δ34S values (+1‰ to +36‰) and textural evidence in shale-hosted massive sulfide (SHMS) deposits suggest a greater role for thermochemical sulfate reduction (TSR) in sulfide mineralization.