Generative AI in Science Communication: Fostering Scientists’ Good Working Habits for Ethical and Effective Use

Scientists increasingly use generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) to aid in science communication tasks due to limited time and resources. GenAI can function as a writing assistant, idea generator, or collaborative tool. While it offers promising support, it is crucial to address potential pitfalls, such as misinformation due to its stochastic nature, dependency on prompt specificity, and the risk of reproducing biases and stereotypes. To mitigate these issues, scientists should be trained in competencies that foster ethical and effective interactions with GenAI, ensuring they develop what we call “Good Working Habits” for science communication with GenAI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Communication
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470251343486
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.83

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI in Science Communication: Fostering Scientists’ Good Working Habits for Ethical and Effective Use

Esther Greussing, Inbal Klein-Avraham, Monika Taddicken, Ayelet Baram‐Tsabari et al.
5 citations
Science Communication
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
11.83
article

Generative AI in Science Communication: Fostering Scientists’ Good Working Habits for Ethical and Effective Use

Esther Greussing, Inbal Klein-Avraham, Monika Taddicken, Ayelet Baram‐Tsabari, Yael Barel-Ben David, Julian Fick, Friederike Hendriks, Tzipora Rakedzon, Lennart Banse
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Scientists increasingly use generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) to aid in science communication tasks due to limited time and resources. GenAI can function as a writing assistant, idea generator, or collaborative tool. While it offers promising support, it is crucial to address potential pitfalls, such as misinformation due to its stochastic nature, dependency on prompt specificity, and the risk of reproducing biases and stereotypes. To mitigate these issues, scientists should be trained in competencies that foster ethical and effective interactions with GenAI, ensuring they develop what we call “Good Working Habits” for science communication with GenAI.

Science Communication
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL), Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE), Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education (DE), Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Niedersächsisches Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kultur
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
11.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.