What is Evil and How to Deal with It? 2 Thess 2:3-12 in the Exegesis of Byzantine Commentators from an Orthodox-Critical Perspective

This study presents and evaluates interpretations of 2 Thess 2:3-12 from a critical-Orthodox perspective in the Greek commentaries of Severian of Gabala, John Chrysostom, Theodoret of Cyrus, John of Damascus (dubium), and Theophylact of Ohrid. The patristic comments elaborate on the nature, actions, and unique connection between the Antichrist and the devil, as well as the significance of “the restrainer”, which prevents the Antichrist’s arrival. The commentaries also thoroughly discuss the concept of the “mystery of lawlessness”, the responsibility and condemnation of those who will believe in the Antichrist, and his ultimate defeat by the Lord Jesus Christ at his second coming. In conclusion, the study finds that the patristic commentators, by extensively referring to the Antichrist, essentially describe the nature of evil – personified by the figure of the Antichrist – and the way to address it. According to this conclusion, evil primarily consists in human self-deification and simultaneous estrangement from communion with God. Evil must be overcome with good; thus, through faith in God, abstaining from all forms of aggression, and practicing love for one’s fellow human beings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Salesianum
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63343/ij6570gy
Primary Topic
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What is Evil and How to Deal with It? 2 Thess 2:3-12 in the Exegesis of Byzantine Commentators from an Orthodox-Critical Perspective

Christos Karakolis
Salesianum
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
article

What is Evil and How to Deal with It? 2 Thess 2:3-12 in the Exegesis of Byzantine Commentators from an Orthodox-Critical Perspective

Christos Karakolis
article en

Abstract

This study presents and evaluates interpretations of 2 Thess 2:3-12 from a critical-Orthodox perspective in the Greek commentaries of Severian of Gabala, John Chrysostom, Theodoret of Cyrus, John of Damascus (dubium), and Theophylact of Ohrid. The patristic comments elaborate on the nature, actions, and unique connection between the Antichrist and the devil, as well as the significance of “the restrainer”, which prevents the Antichrist’s arrival. The commentaries also thoroughly discuss the concept of the “mystery of lawlessness”, the responsibility and condemnation of those who will believe in the Antichrist, and his ultimate defeat by the Lord Jesus Christ at his second coming. In conclusion, the study finds that the patristic commentators, by extensively referring to the Antichrist, essentially describe the nature of evil – personified by the figure of the Antichrist – and the way to address it. According to this conclusion, evil primarily consists in human self-deification and simultaneous estrangement from communion with God. Evil must be overcome with good; thus, through faith in God, abstaining from all forms of aggression, and practicing love for one’s fellow human beings.

SalesianumVol. 87(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What is Evil and How to Deal with It? 2 Thess 2:3-12 in the Exegesis of Byzantine Commentators from an Orthodox-Critical Perspective — Christos Karakolis · Salesianum (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS