AI Driven Exploit Mitigation for Zero Day Vulnerability Using SVM and Autoencoder

This study is about the action taken to reduce the risk or impact of a "zero-day vulnerability" (flaw or weakness in a software that is unknown to the makers or the public but that can be exploited by attackers). This study helps to analyze the exploits in a software to prevent cyberattacks. This study evaluates the performance of SVM and Autoencoder to classify the "zero-day vulnerability" dataset. SVM classifier got an accuracy of 94.9%, precision and recall values of 20.83% and 30%, f1-score at 23% and specificity of 94%. Whereas, autoencoder got an accuracy of 81.6%, precision and recall values of 21% and 28%, f1-score at 21.05% and specificity of 81%. According to the achieved values, SVM provides better accuracy than autoencoder in analyzing the dataset.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icaeca63854.2025.11012512
Primary Topic
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Driven Exploit Mitigation for Zero Day Vulnerability Using SVM and Autoencoder

Sri Phani Krishna K
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
article

AI Driven Exploit Mitigation for Zero Day Vulnerability Using SVM and Autoencoder

Sri Phani Krishna K
article en

Abstract

This study is about the action taken to reduce the risk or impact of a "zero-day vulnerability" (flaw or weakness in a software that is unknown to the makers or the public but that can be exploited by attackers). This study helps to analyze the exploits in a software to prevent cyberattacks. This study evaluates the performance of SVM and Autoencoder to classify the "zero-day vulnerability" dataset. SVM classifier got an accuracy of 94.9%, precision and recall values of 20.83% and 30%, f1-score at 23% and specificity of 94%. Whereas, autoencoder got an accuracy of 81.6%, precision and recall values of 21% and 28%, f1-score at 21.05% and specificity of 81%. According to the achieved values, SVM provides better accuracy than autoencoder in analyzing the dataset.

Saveetha University (IN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.