MRI-Based Prediction of Meniscal Tear Repairability Demonstrates Limited Accuracy and Reliability

<b>Background:</b> While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used to identify meniscal tears, intraoperative assessment typically dictates repairability. This study evaluated whether a simplified MRI-based scoring system could reliably predict meniscal repair versus meniscectomy. <b>Methods:</b> Patients who underwent meniscectomy or meniscal repair between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively identified. Preoperative MRIs were independently reviewed in a blinded fashion by two radiologists and one orthopedic sports surgeon. Reviewers scored images based on four arthroscopic criteria for tear repairability, with one point awarded for each of the following criteria-(1) proximity within 4 mm of the meniscosynovial junction, (2) length > 10 mm, (3) presence of intact inner meniscal segment, and (4) >50% meniscal thickness. Tears scoring four points were considered repairable. Accuracy, sensitivity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated against the actual procedure performed. Inter- and intraobserver reliability were evaluated using kappa statistics. The predictive performance of each individual criterion was also analyzed. <b>Results:</b> A total of 202 meniscal tears were included (134 meniscectomies and 68 repairs). Reviewer accuracy in predicting repairability ranged from 48% to 76%. Intraobserver reliability was moderate to substantial (κ = 0.42-0.66), whereas interobserver reliability was poor to moderate (pairwise κ = 0.07-0.43; Fleiss' κ = 0.11). Analysis of individual MRI criteria demonstrated limited predictive value, with most criteria achieving less than 50% accuracy across reviewers. <b>Conclusions:</b> MRI-based prediction of meniscal repairability using arthroscopic criteria demonstrated limited accuracy and poor interobserver reliability. Overall predictive reliability remains insufficient for clinical decision-making. Further investigation, integrating advanced imaging techniques and artificial intelligence, may improve the preoperative assessment of meniscal repairability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124160
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MRI-Based Prediction of Meniscal Tear Repairability Demonstrates Limited Accuracy and Reliability

Cyrus P. Bateni, Cassandra A. Lee, Dillon Z. Chen, Shannon Tse et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
2.01
article

MRI-Based Prediction of Meniscal Tear Repairability Demonstrates Limited Accuracy and Reliability

Cyrus P. Bateni, Cassandra A. Lee, Dillon Z. Chen, Shannon Tse, Christopher T. Holland
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used to identify meniscal tears, intraoperative assessment typically dictates repairability. This study evaluated whether a simplified MRI-based scoring system could reliably predict meniscal repair versus meniscectomy. <b>Methods:</b> Patients who underwent meniscectomy or meniscal repair between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively identified. Preoperative MRIs were independently reviewed in a blinded fashion by two radiologists and one orthopedic sports surgeon. Reviewers scored images based on four arthroscopic criteria for tear repairability, with one point awarded for each of the following criteria-(1) proximity within 4 mm of the meniscosynovial junction, (2) length > 10 mm, (3) presence of intact inner meniscal segment, and (4) >50% meniscal thickness. Tears scoring four points were considered repairable. Accuracy, sensitivity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated against the actual procedure performed. Inter- and intraobserver reliability were evaluated using kappa statistics. The predictive performance of each individual criterion was also analyzed. <b>Results:</b> A total of 202 meniscal tears were included (134 meniscectomies and 68 repairs). Reviewer accuracy in predicting repairability ranged from 48% to 76%. Intraobserver reliability was moderate to substantial (κ = 0.42-0.66), whereas interobserver reliability was poor to moderate (pairwise κ = 0.07-0.43; Fleiss' κ = 0.11). Analysis of individual MRI criteria demonstrated limited predictive value, with most criteria achieving less than 50% accuracy across reviewers. <b>Conclusions:</b> MRI-based prediction of meniscal repairability using arthroscopic criteria demonstrated limited accuracy and poor interobserver reliability. Overall predictive reliability remains insufficient for clinical decision-making. Further investigation, integrating advanced imaging techniques and artificial intelligence, may improve the preoperative assessment of meniscal repairability.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(12)
University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US), Campbell Clinic (US), University of California, Davis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.