Comparative Review on Acceptance of Digital Evidence within the Legal Frameworks of Pakistan and China

The main objective of this article was to provide an extensive comparative investigation of the treatment and acceptance of digital evidence within the legal frameworks of Pakistan and China. In recent times, both nations have recognized the profound influence of technology on present-day culture. The acknowledgment of this phenomenon has prompted them to adopt strategies targeted at governing and effectively incorporating digital evidence into their separate judicial systems. In order to achieve this objective, the study conducts a comprehensive analysis of the relevant legislative provisions in both countries, investigates notable instances that illustrate the treatment of digital evidence within their respective legal frameworks, and investigates the prevailing strategies that have been used. The primary goal was to derive useful lessons and insights from these comparative observations, with the aim of subsequently applying them to a global environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Law and Legal Advancement
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64060/ijlla.v1i1.1
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Digital and Cyber Forensics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.74
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Review on Acceptance of Digital Evidence within the Legal Frameworks of Pakistan and China

Jamil Afzal
3 citations
International Journal of Law and Legal Advancement
Digital and Cyber Forensics
9.74
article

Comparative Review on Acceptance of Digital Evidence within the Legal Frameworks of Pakistan and China

Jamil Afzal
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The main objective of this article was to provide an extensive comparative investigation of the treatment and acceptance of digital evidence within the legal frameworks of Pakistan and China. In recent times, both nations have recognized the profound influence of technology on present-day culture. The acknowledgment of this phenomenon has prompted them to adopt strategies targeted at governing and effectively incorporating digital evidence into their separate judicial systems. In order to achieve this objective, the study conducts a comprehensive analysis of the relevant legislative provisions in both countries, investigates notable instances that illustrate the treatment of digital evidence within their respective legal frameworks, and investigates the prevailing strategies that have been used. The primary goal was to derive useful lessons and insights from these comparative observations, with the aim of subsequently applying them to a global environment.

International Journal of Law and Legal AdvancementVol. 1(1)
Southwest University of Political Science & Law (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Digital and Cyber Forensics
9.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.