Generative AI and its disruptive challenge to journalism: an institutional analysis

Abstract This conceptual article examines the transformative impact of generative artificial intelligence (AI) on journalism through the lens of institutionalism. Building on Stephen D. Reese’s definition of institutions as “complex social structures” sustained by interlocking norms, roles, technologies, and collective frames of meaning, the article argues that generative AI marks a pivotal shift in journalism’s institutional coherence. Unlike earlier technological disruptions, generative AI directly intervenes in the core creative processes of journalism, challenging traditional norms of authorship, originality, and professional identity. Drawing on scholarship from institutionalism as it pertains to journalism studies and from Human–Machine Communication (HMC), this study situates generative AI as a transformative force within journalism while also acknowledging it as an emerging institution in its own right. We advance theoretical debates regarding the implications of GenAI for journalism and chart a path for future research into the ethical, epistemic, and operational dimensions of AI-driven journalism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communication and Change
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44382-025-00008-x
Citations
21
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
49.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI and its disruptive challenge to journalism: an institutional analysis

Bibo Lin, Andrea L. Guzman, Seth C. Lewis, Thomas Schmidt
21 citations
Communication and Change
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
49.68
article

Generative AI and its disruptive challenge to journalism: an institutional analysis

Bibo Lin, Andrea L. Guzman, Seth C. Lewis, Thomas Schmidt
article en
21 citations

Abstract

Abstract This conceptual article examines the transformative impact of generative artificial intelligence (AI) on journalism through the lens of institutionalism. Building on Stephen D. Reese’s definition of institutions as “complex social structures” sustained by interlocking norms, roles, technologies, and collective frames of meaning, the article argues that generative AI marks a pivotal shift in journalism’s institutional coherence. Unlike earlier technological disruptions, generative AI directly intervenes in the core creative processes of journalism, challenging traditional norms of authorship, originality, and professional identity. Drawing on scholarship from institutionalism as it pertains to journalism studies and from Human–Machine Communication (HMC), this study situates generative AI as a transformative force within journalism while also acknowledging it as an emerging institution in its own right. We advance theoretical debates regarding the implications of GenAI for journalism and chart a path for future research into the ethical, epistemic, and operational dimensions of AI-driven journalism.

Communication and ChangeVol. 1(1)
Northern Illinois University (US), University of Oregon (US), University of California San Diego (US)
University of Oregon
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
49.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.