Comparative Analysis of LSTM and XGBoost for Cryptocurrency Trend Prediction

It is difficult to predict cryptocurrency market trends due to volatility and extraneous factors. In this study, the XGBoost and LSTM models are contrasted in terms of forecasting bullish and bearish trends in the Ethereum market. Technical indicators like Simple Moving Average (SMA), Exponential Moving Average (EMA), and trading volume were employed as features based on past market data. Market tendencies were established through changes in closing price on a day-to-day basis, and training and testing the two models applied was carried out on normalized data under supervised learning. Results in experiments show that XGBoost exhibited superior performance at 84.58%, which was entirely above the 50.45% achieved using LSTM. The differential in performance implicates superior performance by XGBoost in establishing nonlinear relations among input features and market tendencies. The results show that XGBoost is more suitable for market trend classification, while LSTM cannot generalize and overfit time-series patterns. The results offer possibilities for sequential model enhancement by employing more technical indicators or hybrid architectures that combine time-series analysis and ensemble learning techniques.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ichora65333.2025.11016989
Primary Topic
Big Data Technologies and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of LSTM and XGBoost for Cryptocurrency Trend Prediction

Mohamed El Far, Mohamed Taj Bennani, Khalid El Fahssi, Badre Bossoufi et al.
Big Data Technologies and Applications
article

Comparative Analysis of LSTM and XGBoost for Cryptocurrency Trend Prediction

Mohamed El Far, Mohamed Taj Bennani, Khalid El Fahssi, Badre Bossoufi, Safae Merzouk, Drissia Ennagoura
article en

Abstract

It is difficult to predict cryptocurrency market trends due to volatility and extraneous factors. In this study, the XGBoost and LSTM models are contrasted in terms of forecasting bullish and bearish trends in the Ethereum market. Technical indicators like Simple Moving Average (SMA), Exponential Moving Average (EMA), and trading volume were employed as features based on past market data. Market tendencies were established through changes in closing price on a day-to-day basis, and training and testing the two models applied was carried out on normalized data under supervised learning. Results in experiments show that XGBoost exhibited superior performance at 84.58%, which was entirely above the 50.45% achieved using LSTM. The differential in performance implicates superior performance by XGBoost in establishing nonlinear relations among input features and market tendencies. The results show that XGBoost is more suitable for market trend classification, while LSTM cannot generalize and overfit time-series patterns. The results offer possibilities for sequential model enhancement by employing more technical indicators or hybrid architectures that combine time-series analysis and ensemble learning techniques.

Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University (MA)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Big Data Technologies and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.