Evaluating CNN, RNN, and Vision Transformer for Emotion Recognition: Strengths and Weaknesses

This paper explores three prominent deep learning architectures — Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), and Vision Transformers (ViT) — for emotion recognition, examining their potential strengths and weaknesses under various conditions. It discusses how each approach may capture critical spatial, temporal, or global features in emotional data, highlighting differences in feature extraction, representational capacity, and scalability. Additionally, new solutions are proposed to enhance accuracy and adaptability, integrating design principles that address recognized challenges in real-world implementations. Novel insights are offered on aligning model selection with specific application demands, such as the nature of input signals, available computational resources, and desired real-time performance. While the comparative analysis remains broad to accommodate diverse use cases, it underscores the importance of carefully balancing accuracy and efficiency. Conclusions drawn from the investigation include recommendations on when each architecture may be most advantageous, providing a flexible framework for researchers and practitioners to navigate the trade-offs. These findings have implications for developing adaptive emotion recognition systems that leverage state-of-the-art deep learning techniques across multiple contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/estream66938.2025.11016864
Primary Topic
Emotion and Mood Recognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating CNN, RNN, and Vision Transformer for Emotion Recognition: Strengths and Weaknesses

Anastasiya Chupryna, Kirill Smelyakov, Arkady Semenovich Yushchenko
Emotion and Mood Recognition
article

Evaluating CNN, RNN, and Vision Transformer for Emotion Recognition: Strengths and Weaknesses

Anastasiya Chupryna, Kirill Smelyakov, Arkady Semenovich Yushchenko
article en

Abstract

This paper explores three prominent deep learning architectures — Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), and Vision Transformers (ViT) — for emotion recognition, examining their potential strengths and weaknesses under various conditions. It discusses how each approach may capture critical spatial, temporal, or global features in emotional data, highlighting differences in feature extraction, representational capacity, and scalability. Additionally, new solutions are proposed to enhance accuracy and adaptability, integrating design principles that address recognized challenges in real-world implementations. Novel insights are offered on aligning model selection with specific application demands, such as the nature of input signals, available computational resources, and desired real-time performance. While the comparative analysis remains broad to accommodate diverse use cases, it underscores the importance of carefully balancing accuracy and efficiency. Conclusions drawn from the investigation include recommendations on when each architecture may be most advantageous, providing a flexible framework for researchers and practitioners to navigate the trade-offs. These findings have implications for developing adaptive emotion recognition systems that leverage state-of-the-art deep learning techniques across multiple contexts.

Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics (UA), V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Emotion and Mood Recognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.