Legal & Ethical Implications of Predictive Digital Techniques in the Judicial Criminal Proceedings

The integration of predictive technologies into the Italian criminal justice system represents a transformative opportunity to enhance judicial efficiency, reduce case processing times, and ensure greater consistency in decisions. These tools, powered by Artificial Intelligence, have the potential to optimize case management and resource allocation, particularly in complex areas such as road homicides, where objective and verifiable factors dominate legal reasoning. However, this shift also raises critical ethical and legal challenges, including risks of algorithmic bias, opacity in decision-making processes, and the potential erosion of judicial autonomy. By focusing on issues such as decision-making consistency, the preservation of judicial discretion, and the legal responsibility associated with AI outputs, this work provides a comprehensive analysis of the ethical and legal implications of adopting AI in judicial proceedings. In particular, it explores the benefits and risks of AI-based techniques in the Italian criminal context, emphasizing the need for their implementation to uphold fundamental legal principles such as transparency, accountability, and human-centered decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/isdfs65363.2025.11012003
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal & Ethical Implications of Predictive Digital Techniques in the Judicial Criminal Proceedings

Alessandro Palumbo, Grazia Garzo
2 citations
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
4.96
article

Legal & Ethical Implications of Predictive Digital Techniques in the Judicial Criminal Proceedings

Alessandro Palumbo, Grazia Garzo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The integration of predictive technologies into the Italian criminal justice system represents a transformative opportunity to enhance judicial efficiency, reduce case processing times, and ensure greater consistency in decisions. These tools, powered by Artificial Intelligence, have the potential to optimize case management and resource allocation, particularly in complex areas such as road homicides, where objective and verifiable factors dominate legal reasoning. However, this shift also raises critical ethical and legal challenges, including risks of algorithmic bias, opacity in decision-making processes, and the potential erosion of judicial autonomy. By focusing on issues such as decision-making consistency, the preservation of judicial discretion, and the legal responsibility associated with AI outputs, this work provides a comprehensive analysis of the ethical and legal implications of adopting AI in judicial proceedings. In particular, it explores the benefits and risks of AI-based techniques in the Italian criminal context, emphasizing the need for their implementation to uphold fundamental legal principles such as transparency, accountability, and human-centered decision-making.

University of Siena (IT), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Institut de Recherche en Informatique et Systèmes Aléatoires (FR), Université de Rennes (FR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.