Dismantling EPA’s research office jeopardizes environmental safety, public health, and US competitiveness

Recent reports suggest that the US administration plans to eliminate the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Office of Research and Development (ORD) (1, 2).Most staff would be cut, with remaining personnel reassigned to program offices.The fate of ORD's laboratories, field stations, and scientific infrastructure remains uncertain.While a court order has temporarily paused EPA's reorganization, ORD staff remain in limbo, facing job uncertainty and the potential for a loss of scientific capacity (3).As former EPA and ORD scientists, we argue that dismantling ORD would not only jeopardize human and environmental health, but also weaken American science and global competitiveness.ORD's vital-yet often overlooked-contributions have transformed chemical safety in the United States and abroad.More than a research office, ORD is EPA's scientific core: a central hub with spokes reaching into every aspect of public health, technological innovation, and environmental protection ( Fig. 1 ).ORD has had a litany of achievements-losing or greatly weakening

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2508060122
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dismantling EPA’s research office jeopardizes environmental safety, public health, and US competitiveness

Tamara Tal, H. Christopher Frey, Scott Glaberman
1 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
0.86
article

Dismantling EPA’s research office jeopardizes environmental safety, public health, and US competitiveness

Tamara Tal, H. Christopher Frey, Scott Glaberman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Recent reports suggest that the US administration plans to eliminate the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Office of Research and Development (ORD) (1, 2).Most staff would be cut, with remaining personnel reassigned to program offices.The fate of ORD's laboratories, field stations, and scientific infrastructure remains uncertain.While a court order has temporarily paused EPA's reorganization, ORD staff remain in limbo, facing job uncertainty and the potential for a loss of scientific capacity (3).As former EPA and ORD scientists, we argue that dismantling ORD would not only jeopardize human and environmental health, but also weaken American science and global competitiveness.ORD's vital-yet often overlooked-contributions have transformed chemical safety in the United States and abroad.More than a research office, ORD is EPA's scientific core: a central hub with spokes reaching into every aspect of public health, technological innovation, and environmental protection ( Fig. 1 ).ORD has had a litany of achievements-losing or greatly weakening

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(24)
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), North Carolina State University (US), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
0.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.