On the Optimality of Affine Decision Rules in Distributionally Robust Optimization

We propose conditions under which two-stage distributionally robust optimization problems are optimally solved in affine or K-adaptable affine decision rules. Contrary to previous work, our conditions do not impose any structure on the support of the uncertain parameters, and they ensure pointwise (as opposed to worst case) optimality of (K-adaptable) affine decision rules. The absence of support restrictions allows us to transfer nonlinearities from the problem description to the support via liftings, whereas the pointwise optimality implies that decision rules remain optimal for broad classes of distributionally robust optimization problems, including data-driven problems over [Formula: see text]-divergence or Wasserstein ambiguity sets. We demonstrate how our conditions can be met in two applications. This paper was accepted by Chung Piaw Teo, optimization and decision analytics. Funding: This work was supported by Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [Grant EP/W003317/1]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.00053 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Science
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.00053
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Optimality of Affine Decision Rules in Distributionally Robust Optimization

Angelos Tsoukalas, Angelos Georghiou, Wolfram Wiesemann
2 citations
Management Science
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
4.21
article

On the Optimality of Affine Decision Rules in Distributionally Robust Optimization

Angelos Tsoukalas, Angelos Georghiou, Wolfram Wiesemann
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We propose conditions under which two-stage distributionally robust optimization problems are optimally solved in affine or K-adaptable affine decision rules. Contrary to previous work, our conditions do not impose any structure on the support of the uncertain parameters, and they ensure pointwise (as opposed to worst case) optimality of (K-adaptable) affine decision rules. The absence of support restrictions allows us to transfer nonlinearities from the problem description to the support via liftings, whereas the pointwise optimality implies that decision rules remain optimal for broad classes of distributionally robust optimization problems, including data-driven problems over [Formula: see text]-divergence or Wasserstein ambiguity sets. We demonstrate how our conditions can be met in two applications. This paper was accepted by Chung Piaw Teo, optimization and decision analytics. Funding: This work was supported by Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [Grant EP/W003317/1]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.00053 .

Management ScienceVol. 72(2)
University of Cyprus (CY), Imperial College London (GB), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
4.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.