Probabilistic Deep Learning for Energy Time Series Forecasting: A Comparative Study

Deep learning methods have achieved widespread success and are continually being utilized in new domains, including the prediction of energy time series. However, these methods do not indicate their confidence in predictions, hindering the ability to evaluate, interpret, and enhance forecast accuracy. As a result, this research delves into the exploration of probabilistic extensions to deep learning and their implementation in energy time series forecasting. The evaluated methods include concrete dropout, deep ensembles, Bayesian neural networks, deep Gaussian processes, and functional neural processes. Two load forecasting scenarios are considered for evaluation: short-term (single-step) and day-ahead (multi-step) forecasting. The methods are assessed based on calibration, sharpness, and proficiency in indicating a lack of knowledge. To provide a reference, a simple neural network and a quantile regression model are also employed. Overall, the methods demonstrate strong performance, with concrete dropout, deep ensembles, and Bayesian neural networks performing equally well or better than the reference methods. Functional neural processes and deep Gaussian processes exhibit weaker performance, likely attributed to convergence issues and suboptimal parameters. Notably, deep ensembles prove to be straightforward to implement and train, requiring very few hyperparameters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/isdfs65363.2025.11011947
Primary Topic
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Probabilistic Deep Learning for Energy Time Series Forecasting: A Comparative Study

Sanjay Sharma, Ramakrishna Garine
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
article

Probabilistic Deep Learning for Energy Time Series Forecasting: A Comparative Study

Sanjay Sharma, Ramakrishna Garine
article en

Abstract

Deep learning methods have achieved widespread success and are continually being utilized in new domains, including the prediction of energy time series. However, these methods do not indicate their confidence in predictions, hindering the ability to evaluate, interpret, and enhance forecast accuracy. As a result, this research delves into the exploration of probabilistic extensions to deep learning and their implementation in energy time series forecasting. The evaluated methods include concrete dropout, deep ensembles, Bayesian neural networks, deep Gaussian processes, and functional neural processes. Two load forecasting scenarios are considered for evaluation: short-term (single-step) and day-ahead (multi-step) forecasting. The methods are assessed based on calibration, sharpness, and proficiency in indicating a lack of knowledge. To provide a reference, a simple neural network and a quantile regression model are also employed. Overall, the methods demonstrate strong performance, with concrete dropout, deep ensembles, and Bayesian neural networks performing equally well or better than the reference methods. Functional neural processes and deep Gaussian processes exhibit weaker performance, likely attributed to convergence issues and suboptimal parameters. Notably, deep ensembles prove to be straightforward to implement and train, requiring very few hyperparameters.

University of North Texas (US), Capital One (United States) (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.