Asymmetry in Cross-Sex Cross-Trait Genetic Covariances and the Evolvability of Sexual Dimorphism

AbstractThe evolution of sexual dimorphism is predicted to resolve conflict that can arise from divergent evolutionary interests between sexes, enabling each sex to reach its fitness optimum. However, most of the genome is shared between sexes, which can lead to a genetic constraint for dimorphism evolution. Most studies of intersexual genetic constraints have focused on the effect of genetic correlations, <i>r<sub>mf</sub></i>, for single traits. However, multivariate studies of the <b>B</b> matrix of intersexual genetic covariances suggest that sexual dimorphism may be more evolvable than inferred from <i>r<sub>mf</sub></i> because of the potential for indirect responses to selection from correlated traits. To comprehensively address this question, we collected and reanalyzed published estimates of <b>B</b> using a recently developed approach to quantify the evolvability of sexual monomorphism and dimorphism. We find that across the traits and species we study, the evolvability of dimorphism is lower than that of monomorphism, but also that sexually concordant and antagonistic selection are almost equally capable of producing dimorphism. We also find that asymmetry in <b>B</b> would affect the response to selection more in females than in males. Our results show that sexual dimorphism is more evolvable than studies of <i>r<sub>mf</sub></i> suggest and underscore that sexually antagonistic selection is not required for the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Naturalist
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/737019
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Asymmetry in Cross-Sex Cross-Trait Genetic Covariances and the Evolvability of Sexual Dimorphism

Jacqueline L. Sztepanacz, Mathieu Videlier
1 citations
The American Naturalist
Plant and animal studies
3.03
article

Asymmetry in Cross-Sex Cross-Trait Genetic Covariances and the Evolvability of Sexual Dimorphism

Jacqueline L. Sztepanacz, Mathieu Videlier
article en
1 citations

Abstract

AbstractThe evolution of sexual dimorphism is predicted to resolve conflict that can arise from divergent evolutionary interests between sexes, enabling each sex to reach its fitness optimum. However, most of the genome is shared between sexes, which can lead to a genetic constraint for dimorphism evolution. Most studies of intersexual genetic constraints have focused on the effect of genetic correlations, <i>r<sub>mf</sub></i>, for single traits. However, multivariate studies of the <b>B</b> matrix of intersexual genetic covariances suggest that sexual dimorphism may be more evolvable than inferred from <i>r<sub>mf</sub></i> because of the potential for indirect responses to selection from correlated traits. To comprehensively address this question, we collected and reanalyzed published estimates of <b>B</b> using a recently developed approach to quantify the evolvability of sexual monomorphism and dimorphism. We find that across the traits and species we study, the evolvability of dimorphism is lower than that of monomorphism, but also that sexually concordant and antagonistic selection are almost equally capable of producing dimorphism. We also find that asymmetry in <b>B</b> would affect the response to selection more in females than in males. Our results show that sexual dimorphism is more evolvable than studies of <i>r<sub>mf</sub></i> suggest and underscore that sexually antagonistic selection is not required for the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

The American NaturalistVol. 206(4)
University of Toronto (CA)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Plant and animal studies
3.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.