AdditiveLLM: Large language models predict defects in metals additive manufacturing

In this work we investigate the ability of large language models to predict additive manufacturing defect regimes given a set of process parameter inputs. For this task we utilize a process parameter defect dataset to fine-tune a collection of models, titled AdditiveLLM , for the purpose of predicting potential defect regimes including Keyholing , Lack of Fusion , and Balling . We compare different methods of input formatting in order to gauge the model’s performance to correctly predict defect regimes on our sparse Baseline dataset and our natural language Prompt dataset. The model displays robust predictive capability, achieving a Baseline accuracy of 94% and Prompt accuracy of 82% when asked to provide the defect regimes associated with a set of process parameters. The incorporation of natural language input further simplifies the task of process parameters selection, enabling users to identify optimal settings specific to their build. • Explores usage of LLMs to predict process parameter dependent defects. • Compares fine-tuning of 4 LLMs including DistilBERT, SciBERT, Llama, and T5. • Achieves an accuracy of 93% for sparse inputs and 88% for NLP inputs. • Utilizes dataset comprised of simulation and experimental data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Additive Manufacturing Letters
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addlet.2025.100292
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AdditiveLLM: Large language models predict defects in metals additive manufacturing

Amir Barati Farimani, P. S. Pak
2 citations
Additive Manufacturing Letters
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
1.43
article

AdditiveLLM: Large language models predict defects in metals additive manufacturing

Amir Barati Farimani, P. S. Pak
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In this work we investigate the ability of large language models to predict additive manufacturing defect regimes given a set of process parameter inputs. For this task we utilize a process parameter defect dataset to fine-tune a collection of models, titled AdditiveLLM , for the purpose of predicting potential defect regimes including Keyholing , Lack of Fusion , and Balling . We compare different methods of input formatting in order to gauge the model’s performance to correctly predict defect regimes on our sparse Baseline dataset and our natural language Prompt dataset. The model displays robust predictive capability, achieving a Baseline accuracy of 94% and Prompt accuracy of 82% when asked to provide the defect regimes associated with a set of process parameters. The incorporation of natural language input further simplifies the task of process parameters selection, enabling users to identify optimal settings specific to their build. • Explores usage of LLMs to predict process parameter dependent defects. • Compares fine-tuning of 4 LLMs including DistilBERT, SciBERT, Llama, and T5. • Achieves an accuracy of 93% for sparse inputs and 88% for NLP inputs. • Utilizes dataset comprised of simulation and experimental data.

Additive Manufacturing LettersVol. 14
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AdditiveLLM: Large language models predict defects in metals additive manufacturing — Amir Barati Farimani, P. S. Pak · Additive Manufacturing Letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS