Artificial intelligence in the case-law of the European court of human rights

This article examines the impact of algorithmic and computer systems, methods, and artificial intelligence (AI) software on the judicial practice of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), particularly the challenges and opportunities arising from the technological development of society. The article analyzes the ECtHR’s practice regarding references to AI systems and tools in the text of judicial decisions, related issues concerning the implementation of human rights, as well as identified and potential human rights violations. Special attention is given to issues of privacy, the protection and processing of personal data, and control over their use. These issues are particularly pressing in cases involving the automatic processing of data, algorithmic decisions, and the loss of control over personal data, which may violate the right to privacy under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The article explores specific ECtHR decisions where AI is mentioned directly or indirectly and identifies key issues arising in judicial practice. With the entry into force of the Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024, it can be expected that the use of AI will become even more relevant for the development of judicial practice, as AI technologies increasingly impact democratic processes and fundamental human rights. Therefore, further research on judicial practice and normative initiatives aimed at ensuring human rights in the context of digitalization is crucial for the development of legal standards for the use of AI. The article emphasizes that although existing ECtHR decisions do not directly address the use of AI, they provide important guidelines for the development of legal standards that can be adapted to new realities, particularly for the protection of personal data and privacy guarantees in the digital environment.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32782/ehrlichsjournal-2025-12.05
Primary Topic
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence in the case-law of the European court of human rights

Sergii Burma, O. V. Kutovyi
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
article

Artificial intelligence in the case-law of the European court of human rights

Sergii Burma, O. V. Kutovyi
article en

Abstract

This article examines the impact of algorithmic and computer systems, methods, and artificial intelligence (AI) software on the judicial practice of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), particularly the challenges and opportunities arising from the technological development of society. The article analyzes the ECtHR’s practice regarding references to AI systems and tools in the text of judicial decisions, related issues concerning the implementation of human rights, as well as identified and potential human rights violations. Special attention is given to issues of privacy, the protection and processing of personal data, and control over their use. These issues are particularly pressing in cases involving the automatic processing of data, algorithmic decisions, and the loss of control over personal data, which may violate the right to privacy under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The article explores specific ECtHR decisions where AI is mentioned directly or indirectly and identifies key issues arising in judicial practice. With the entry into force of the Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024, it can be expected that the use of AI will become even more relevant for the development of judicial practice, as AI technologies increasingly impact democratic processes and fundamental human rights. Therefore, further research on judicial practice and normative initiatives aimed at ensuring human rights in the context of digitalization is crucial for the development of legal standards for the use of AI. The article emphasizes that although existing ECtHR decisions do not directly address the use of AI, they provide important guidelines for the development of legal standards that can be adapted to new realities, particularly for the protection of personal data and privacy guarantees in the digital environment.

(12)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.