No facilitatory effects of transcranial random noise stimulation on motion processing: A registered report

Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques have the potential to demonstrate the causal impact of targeted brain regions on specific behaviors. Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) is one form of transcranial electric stimulation in which an alternating current is passed between electrodes at random frequencies. High-frequency tRNS (hf-tRNS) is thought to enhance excitability and have facilitatory effects on behavior, demonstrated in healthy and clinical populations. Due to the potential application of tRNS, clear demonstrations of the efficacy and replicability of stimulation are critical. Here, we focused on replicating the facilitatory effect of hf-tRNS over the human middle temporal complex (hMT+) on contralateral motion processing, initially demonstrated by Ghin et al. (2018). In this prior study, the improvement in performance was specific to global motion processing in the visual field contralateral to stimulation. The motivation to replicate this effect was reinforced by the well-supported hypothesis that hMT+ is critical for contralateral global motion processing. However, our results indicated that hf-tRNS does not improve motion discrimination with n = 42. Specifically, we were unable to replicate a contralateral global motion processing facilitation following hf-tRNS to hMT+. In our within-subject controls, we also found no difference between hf-tRNS to hMT+ on contralateral global motion processing in comparison to sham stimulation, or in comparison to hf-tRNS to the forehead. Although our lack of replication could be due to minor changes in the protocol from the original study, for hf-tRNS to become a widely applied method, its modulatory effect should be robust to slight adjustments to the procedure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cortex
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2025.06.001
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No facilitatory effects of transcranial random noise stimulation on motion processing: A registered report

Chris I. Baker, Matthew Carroll, Grace Edwards, Ryan Ruhde
Cortex
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

No facilitatory effects of transcranial random noise stimulation on motion processing: A registered report

Chris I. Baker, Matthew Carroll, Grace Edwards, Ryan Ruhde
article en

Abstract

Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques have the potential to demonstrate the causal impact of targeted brain regions on specific behaviors. Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) is one form of transcranial electric stimulation in which an alternating current is passed between electrodes at random frequencies. High-frequency tRNS (hf-tRNS) is thought to enhance excitability and have facilitatory effects on behavior, demonstrated in healthy and clinical populations. Due to the potential application of tRNS, clear demonstrations of the efficacy and replicability of stimulation are critical. Here, we focused on replicating the facilitatory effect of hf-tRNS over the human middle temporal complex (hMT+) on contralateral motion processing, initially demonstrated by Ghin et al. (2018). In this prior study, the improvement in performance was specific to global motion processing in the visual field contralateral to stimulation. The motivation to replicate this effect was reinforced by the well-supported hypothesis that hMT+ is critical for contralateral global motion processing. However, our results indicated that hf-tRNS does not improve motion discrimination with n = 42. Specifically, we were unable to replicate a contralateral global motion processing facilitation following hf-tRNS to hMT+. In our within-subject controls, we also found no difference between hf-tRNS to hMT+ on contralateral global motion processing in comparison to sham stimulation, or in comparison to hf-tRNS to the forehead. Although our lack of replication could be due to minor changes in the protocol from the original study, for hf-tRNS to become a widely applied method, its modulatory effect should be robust to slight adjustments to the procedure.

CortexVol. 189
National Institute of Mental Health (US)
National Institute of Mental Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

No facilitatory effects of transcranial random noise stimulation on motion processing: A registered report — Chris I. Baker, Matthew Carroll, et al. · Cortex (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS