Detection of a contralateral breast malignancy using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) overlooked by initial MRI scan

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) has emerged as a promising technology in the field of breast imaging, experiencing growing acceptance. However, the comparative evaluation of its diagnostic accuracy against MRI remains sparse, largely attributed to its relatively recent introduction. Current studies suggest that MRI and CEM exhibit comparable sensitivity for detecting the index breast lesion. However, there is conflicting evidence regarding their sensitivity in detecting additional breast lesions in cases of known breast cancer, with some studies demonstrating MRI's superiority and others reporting similar sensitivity between the 2 modalities. We present a case where CEM effectively detected a contralateral breast malignancy in a patient with a newly diagnosed breast cancer, whereas it went undetected by MRI initially. Our presentation underscores the importance of more comprehensive research to assess CEM's overall diagnostic capabilities in breast imaging in comparison to MRI, as there may be situations where CEM outperforms MRI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology Case Reports
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2025.05.046
Primary Topic
MRI in cancer diagnosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detection of a contralateral breast malignancy using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) overlooked by initial MRI scan

Sahar Darabi Monadi, Tamara Suaris, Vasiliki Papalouka, Roya Faghani
1 links
Radiology Case Reports
MRI in cancer diagnosis
article

Detection of a contralateral breast malignancy using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) overlooked by initial MRI scan

Sahar Darabi Monadi, Tamara Suaris, Vasiliki Papalouka, Roya Faghani
article en

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) has emerged as a promising technology in the field of breast imaging, experiencing growing acceptance. However, the comparative evaluation of its diagnostic accuracy against MRI remains sparse, largely attributed to its relatively recent introduction. Current studies suggest that MRI and CEM exhibit comparable sensitivity for detecting the index breast lesion. However, there is conflicting evidence regarding their sensitivity in detecting additional breast lesions in cases of known breast cancer, with some studies demonstrating MRI's superiority and others reporting similar sensitivity between the 2 modalities. We present a case where CEM effectively detected a contralateral breast malignancy in a patient with a newly diagnosed breast cancer, whereas it went undetected by MRI initially. Our presentation underscores the importance of more comprehensive research to assess CEM's overall diagnostic capabilities in breast imaging in comparison to MRI, as there may be situations where CEM outperforms MRI.

Radiology Case ReportsVol. 20(9)
Barts Health NHS Trust (GB), Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
MRI in cancer diagnosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.