"Corporate Purpose" as a False Friend: A Bibliometric Analysis

The term "corporate purpose" is frequently used, both in academic and non-academic writings today. However, it is also quite ambiguous, particularly in relation to the precise obligations that companies may be expected to fulfil. By presenting a bibliometric analysis of this term over recent decades, this article assesses its popularity and usage. It finds that the term "corporate purpose" was already quite popular in the 1960s and 1980s, yet with different meanings than today; that recent publications discuss this term in more detail than in the past; that it is today often associated with social and environmental topics; and that it has recently become a term frequently used in the management and business literature. Overall, the empirical findings of this article confirm that while the term has many ambiguities, and thus may not be a useful legal term, it may well be suitable as a conceptual framing device for the importance of social and environmental interests related to companies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Victoria University of Wellington Law Review
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v55i3.9832
Primary Topic
Cultural, Linguistic, Economic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

"Corporate Purpose" as a False Friend: A Bibliometric Analysis

Mathias Siems
Victoria University of Wellington Law Review
Cultural, Linguistic, Economic Studies
article

"Corporate Purpose" as a False Friend: A Bibliometric Analysis

Mathias Siems
article en

Abstract

The term "corporate purpose" is frequently used, both in academic and non-academic writings today. However, it is also quite ambiguous, particularly in relation to the precise obligations that companies may be expected to fulfil. By presenting a bibliometric analysis of this term over recent decades, this article assesses its popularity and usage. It finds that the term "corporate purpose" was already quite popular in the 1960s and 1980s, yet with different meanings than today; that recent publications discuss this term in more detail than in the past; that it is today often associated with social and environmental topics; and that it has recently become a term frequently used in the management and business literature. Overall, the empirical findings of this article confirm that while the term has many ambiguities, and thus may not be a useful legal term, it may well be suitable as a conceptual framing device for the importance of social and environmental interests related to companies.

Victoria University of Wellington Law ReviewVol. 55(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Cultural, Linguistic, Economic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.