Effects of “DOUBLE-DOUBLE” cooperative-learning techniques in junior high school science

Cooperative learning involves structured small group activities that enhance cognitive engagement through peer interactions, and is recognized as an effective instructional approach.Among various forms of cooperative learning, constructive interaction, in which students co-construct an abstract understanding using discussions, plays a crucial role in promoting deep learning.The knowledgeconstructive jigsaw method has been proposed as an instructional design to facilitate such interactions.However, its implementation poses challenges including the complexity of task structures, constraints related to group formation, and extended lesson durations.To address these challenges, Shima and Watanabe (2021) introduced the "DOUBLE-DOUBLE" method, a simplified approach to cooperative learning.The present study investigates the effectiveness of the "DOUBLE-DOUBLE" method in middle school science education.Participants were third-year students from a public junior high school.Two classes (Class A: 36 students, Class B: 28 students) received instructions using the "DOUBLE-DOUBLE" method, while a third class (Class C: 32 students) received conventional instruction as the control group.The instructional intervention focused on the unit "Composition and Decomposition of Forces."Students' conceptual understanding was assessed using pre-and post-tasks based on the one-page portfolio (OPP) method.The results revealed a significant improvement in correct responses exclusively in the experimental groups using the "DOUBLE-DOUBLE" method.Additionally, students in these groups demonstrated significantly higher scores on written explanations than those in the control group.Discourse analysis indicated that students experienced difficulties in integrating different tasks into a coherent understanding, suggesting the need for additional instructional scaffolding.These findings suggest that the "DOUBLE-DOUBLE" method facilitates the development of conceptual understanding by promoting structured peer discourse; however, further refinements are needed for optimal implementation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Human Environmental Studies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4189/shes.23.59
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of “DOUBLE-DOUBLE” cooperative-learning techniques in junior high school science

Makito Hirami, Ryo Matsumoto
Journal of Human Environmental Studies
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
article

Effects of “DOUBLE-DOUBLE” cooperative-learning techniques in junior high school science

Makito Hirami, Ryo Matsumoto
article en

Abstract

Cooperative learning involves structured small group activities that enhance cognitive engagement through peer interactions, and is recognized as an effective instructional approach.Among various forms of cooperative learning, constructive interaction, in which students co-construct an abstract understanding using discussions, plays a crucial role in promoting deep learning.The knowledgeconstructive jigsaw method has been proposed as an instructional design to facilitate such interactions.However, its implementation poses challenges including the complexity of task structures, constraints related to group formation, and extended lesson durations.To address these challenges, Shima and Watanabe (2021) introduced the "DOUBLE-DOUBLE" method, a simplified approach to cooperative learning.The present study investigates the effectiveness of the "DOUBLE-DOUBLE" method in middle school science education.Participants were third-year students from a public junior high school.Two classes (Class A: 36 students, Class B: 28 students) received instructions using the "DOUBLE-DOUBLE" method, while a third class (Class C: 32 students) received conventional instruction as the control group.The instructional intervention focused on the unit "Composition and Decomposition of Forces."Students' conceptual understanding was assessed using pre-and post-tasks based on the one-page portfolio (OPP) method.The results revealed a significant improvement in correct responses exclusively in the experimental groups using the "DOUBLE-DOUBLE" method.Additionally, students in these groups demonstrated significantly higher scores on written explanations than those in the control group.Discourse analysis indicated that students experienced difficulties in integrating different tasks into a coherent understanding, suggesting the need for additional instructional scaffolding.These findings suggest that the "DOUBLE-DOUBLE" method facilitates the development of conceptual understanding by promoting structured peer discourse; however, further refinements are needed for optimal implementation.

Journal of Human Environmental StudiesVol. 23(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effects of “DOUBLE-DOUBLE” cooperative-learning techniques in junior high school science — Makito Hirami, Ryo Matsumoto · Journal of Human Environmental Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS