Person perception of agents who lack understanding of the potential harm of nuisance

Evaluations of nuisance behavior are often negative, even when such behavior does not cause significant harm.However, factors contributing to these negative evaluations remain unclear.This study examined whether observers negatively evaluate actors who do not understand the potential harm resulting from their nuisance behavior.Study 1 demonstrated that individuals were perceived as cold and incompetent when they did not understand that nuisance behavior was harmful, even in the absence of such behavior.Study 2 replicated these findings and showed that regardless of engagement in nuisance acts, an agent who was unaware of the harm their acts might cause was blamed and socially distanced.These judgments were sequentially mediated by the perceived coldness of the agent and perceived future likelihood of engagement in nuisance.Moreover, unaware agents were associated with animals, which have low intellectual abilities.These results indicate that negative nuisance evaluations are driven primarily by the perpetrator's unawareness of their impact on others, rather than by the harm caused by the behavior.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Human Environmental Studies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4189/shes.23.73
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Person perception of agents who lack understanding of the potential harm of nuisance

Keiko Ishii, Minoru Karasawa, Yasushi Sato
1 links
Journal of Human Environmental Studies
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

Person perception of agents who lack understanding of the potential harm of nuisance

Keiko Ishii, Minoru Karasawa, Yasushi Sato
article en

Abstract

Evaluations of nuisance behavior are often negative, even when such behavior does not cause significant harm.However, factors contributing to these negative evaluations remain unclear.This study examined whether observers negatively evaluate actors who do not understand the potential harm resulting from their nuisance behavior.Study 1 demonstrated that individuals were perceived as cold and incompetent when they did not understand that nuisance behavior was harmful, even in the absence of such behavior.Study 2 replicated these findings and showed that regardless of engagement in nuisance acts, an agent who was unaware of the harm their acts might cause was blamed and socially distanced.These judgments were sequentially mediated by the perceived coldness of the agent and perceived future likelihood of engagement in nuisance.Moreover, unaware agents were associated with animals, which have low intellectual abilities.These results indicate that negative nuisance evaluations are driven primarily by the perpetrator's unawareness of their impact on others, rather than by the harm caused by the behavior.

Journal of Human Environmental StudiesVol. 23(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.