Motor sequence learning elicits mu peak-specific corticospinal plasticity

Motor cortical (M1) transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) interventions increase corticospinal output and improve motor learning when delivered during sensorimotor mu rhythm trough but not peak phases, suggesting that the mechanisms supporting motor learning may be most active during mu trough phases. Based on these findings, we predicted that motor sequence learning-related corticospinal plasticity would be most evident when measured during mu trough phases. Healthy adults were assigned to either a sequence or no-sequence group. Participants in the sequence group practiced the implicit serial reaction time task (SRTT), which contained an embedded, repeating 12-item sequence. Participants in the no-sequence group practiced a version of the SRTT that contained no sequence. We measured mu phase-independent and mu phase-dependent MEP amplitudes using EEG-informed single-pulse TMS before, immediately after, and 30 min after the SRTT in both groups. All participants performed a retention test 1 h after SRTT acquisition. In both groups, mu phase-independent MEP amplitudes increased following SRTT acquisition, but the pattern of mu phase-dependent MEP amplitude changes after SRTT acquisition differed between groups. Relative to the no-sequence group, the sequence group showed greater peak-specific MEP amplitude increases 30 min after SRTT acquisition. Furthermore, the magnitude of these peak-specific MEP amplitude increases was negatively associated with the magnitude of sequence learning. Contrary to our original hypothesis, results revealed that motor sequence learning elicits peak-specific corticospinal plasticity. Findings provide first direct evidence that motor sequence learning recruits mu phase-dependent neurophysiological processes in the human brain.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Recent work suggests that motor learning's neural mechanisms may be most active during specific sensorimotor mu rhythm phases. If so, motor sequence learning-induced corticospinal plasticity should be more evident during some mu phases than others. Our results show that motor sequence learning elicits corticospinal plasticity that is most prominent during mu peak phases. Furthermore, this peak-specific plasticity correlates with learning. Findings provide first evidence that motor learning elicits mu phase-dependent plasticity in the human brain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00579.2024
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Motor sequence learning elicits mu peak-specific corticospinal plasticity

Tharan Suresh, Sara J. Hussain, Michael Freedberg, Fumiaki Iwane et al.
1 links
Journal of Neurophysiology
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
article

Motor sequence learning elicits mu peak-specific corticospinal plasticity

Tharan Suresh, Sara J. Hussain, Michael Freedberg, Fumiaki Iwane, Margaret McElmurry, Muskan Manesiya, Minsu Zhang
article en

Abstract

Motor cortical (M1) transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) interventions increase corticospinal output and improve motor learning when delivered during sensorimotor mu rhythm trough but not peak phases, suggesting that the mechanisms supporting motor learning may be most active during mu trough phases. Based on these findings, we predicted that motor sequence learning-related corticospinal plasticity would be most evident when measured during mu trough phases. Healthy adults were assigned to either a sequence or no-sequence group. Participants in the sequence group practiced the implicit serial reaction time task (SRTT), which contained an embedded, repeating 12-item sequence. Participants in the no-sequence group practiced a version of the SRTT that contained no sequence. We measured mu phase-independent and mu phase-dependent MEP amplitudes using EEG-informed single-pulse TMS before, immediately after, and 30 min after the SRTT in both groups. All participants performed a retention test 1 h after SRTT acquisition. In both groups, mu phase-independent MEP amplitudes increased following SRTT acquisition, but the pattern of mu phase-dependent MEP amplitude changes after SRTT acquisition differed between groups. Relative to the no-sequence group, the sequence group showed greater peak-specific MEP amplitude increases 30 min after SRTT acquisition. Furthermore, the magnitude of these peak-specific MEP amplitude increases was negatively associated with the magnitude of sequence learning. Contrary to our original hypothesis, results revealed that motor sequence learning elicits peak-specific corticospinal plasticity. Findings provide first direct evidence that motor sequence learning recruits mu phase-dependent neurophysiological processes in the human brain.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Recent work suggests that motor learning's neural mechanisms may be most active during specific sensorimotor mu rhythm phases. If so, motor sequence learning-induced corticospinal plasticity should be more evident during some mu phases than others. Our results show that motor sequence learning elicits corticospinal plasticity that is most prominent during mu peak phases. Furthermore, this peak-specific plasticity correlates with learning. Findings provide first evidence that motor learning elicits mu phase-dependent plasticity in the human brain.

Journal of NeurophysiologyVol. 134(1)
National Institutes of Health (US), Texas Health and Science University (US), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.