Is There a General Preference for the Worse Off? A Discrete Choice Experiment Using Individually Calibrated Health State Valuations
Our two-stage design using individual health state values is feasible, although there are trade-offs and room for development with such a design. We found no support for a preference for prioritizing the worse off when using individual-level health state valuations.
Authors
- Marius L Torjusen
- Knut Stavem (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4512-8000)
- Kim Rand (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7692-4099)
- David G. T. Whitehurst (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7890-6756)
- Mathias Barra (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0022-4042)
Institutions
- Simon Fraser University (CA)
- Akershus University Hospital (NO)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Value in Health
- Published
- 2025-06-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.05.017
- Primary Topic
- Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- EuroQol Research Foundation