The ethics of digital nudging for sustainable energy consumption – A closer look at the EU Green Deal

Digitally nudging consumers towards sustainable energy consumption is a practice favoured by multiple EU-funded (research) projects and is an accepted tool for reaching the goals of the European Green Deal. The morality of digital energy nudges, as we will refer to them, yet remains under-investigated. In this article, we address this lacune by first defining digital energy nudges. Then, we elaborate on the EU green deal and how it stimulates (digital) energy nudges. We then analyse the ethical issues and the efficiency issues created by digital energy nudges, especially those instigated or funded by governments. We argue there are significant ethical issues that need to be addressed. Finally, we provide recommendations for policy advisors, governments and other practitioners on how to create ethical and efficient digital energy nudges, with a focus on recommendations for the EU • Defining digital energy nudges (inspired on Saghai, 2013 ) as: A digital energy nudge created by A makes it more likely that B will reduce their energy consumption and/or rely more on renewable energy sources, by creating digital environments using design and interaction elements to trigger B’s shallow cognitive processes, whilst preserving B’s choice-set. • Highlighting the relationship between digital energy nudges and the EU green deal, arguing that projects funded the EU green deal stimulate the use of digital green nudges and that this creates ethical issues. • Analysing the ethial issues as well as the efficiency issues created by digital energy nudges, esspecially those instigted or funded by governments. The article distinguishes between issues to do with adverse consequences, including the creation of psychological burdens, instigation of antagonistic psychological reactions, creation of short term effects, polarization, and depolitization, and issues to do with inherent traits, including violation of autonomy, injustice, and hypera-agency. • Providing recommendations for policy advisors, governments and other practioners on how to create ethical as well as efficient digital energy nudges. The recommendations are seperated into substantial and procedural recommendations. The substantial recommendations are to beware of nudges aimed at social norms, create clear democratic mandate, and focus on inclusivity for all EU citizens. The precedural recommendations are to create test cases, share results, create a mechanisms through which citizens can protest digital energy nudges, and to investigate the potential of boosts rather than nudges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technology in Society
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102990
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ethics of digital nudging for sustainable energy consumption – A closer look at the EU Green Deal

Paul Kuyer, Fiachra Ó’Brolcháin, Victor Rodrı́guez-Doncel, Bert Gordijn et al.
8 citations
Technology in Society
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
8.84
article

The ethics of digital nudging for sustainable energy consumption – A closer look at the EU Green Deal

Paul Kuyer, Fiachra Ó’Brolcháin, Victor Rodrı́guez-Doncel, Bert Gordijn, S. Shukla
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Digitally nudging consumers towards sustainable energy consumption is a practice favoured by multiple EU-funded (research) projects and is an accepted tool for reaching the goals of the European Green Deal. The morality of digital energy nudges, as we will refer to them, yet remains under-investigated. In this article, we address this lacune by first defining digital energy nudges. Then, we elaborate on the EU green deal and how it stimulates (digital) energy nudges. We then analyse the ethical issues and the efficiency issues created by digital energy nudges, especially those instigated or funded by governments. We argue there are significant ethical issues that need to be addressed. Finally, we provide recommendations for policy advisors, governments and other practitioners on how to create ethical and efficient digital energy nudges, with a focus on recommendations for the EU • Defining digital energy nudges (inspired on Saghai, 2013 ) as: A digital energy nudge created by A makes it more likely that B will reduce their energy consumption and/or rely more on renewable energy sources, by creating digital environments using design and interaction elements to trigger B’s shallow cognitive processes, whilst preserving B’s choice-set. • Highlighting the relationship between digital energy nudges and the EU green deal, arguing that projects funded the EU green deal stimulate the use of digital green nudges and that this creates ethical issues. • Analysing the ethial issues as well as the efficiency issues created by digital energy nudges, esspecially those instigted or funded by governments. The article distinguishes between issues to do with adverse consequences, including the creation of psychological burdens, instigation of antagonistic psychological reactions, creation of short term effects, polarization, and depolitization, and issues to do with inherent traits, including violation of autonomy, injustice, and hypera-agency. • Providing recommendations for policy advisors, governments and other practioners on how to create ethical as well as efficient digital energy nudges. The recommendations are seperated into substantial and procedural recommendations. The substantial recommendations are to beware of nudges aimed at social norms, create clear democratic mandate, and focus on inclusivity for all EU citizens. The precedural recommendations are to create test cases, share results, create a mechanisms through which citizens can protest digital energy nudges, and to investigate the potential of boosts rather than nudges.

Technology in SocietyVol. 83
Dublin City University (IE), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
8.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.