Growth following adversity is rare: Evidence from a multi-informant longitudinal study of children and adolescents

• Tested whether adversity is necessary for psychological growth. • Latent growth curve models applied to a multi-informant longitudinal study of youth. • The average association between adversity and growth was either null or negative. • A small sub-group grew despite adversity; however, most grew without adversity. • Researchers should look elsewhere for life experiences that reliably lead to growth. The idea that adversity is necessary for psychological growth pervades cultural narratives and lay theories. We empirically tested this notion with a multi-informant, longitudinal study of children and adolescents ( n = 682). Initial adversity was not associated with change in effortful control and emotional stability, while increasing adversity was negatively correlated with growth. However, a small sub-group of individuals still managed to grow despite adversity. The narrative that adversity is crucial for growth likely originated, and continues to survive, because scholars and laypeople focus on this minority who grow despite adversity, while overlooking the overall null or negative association. The accumulated evidence suggests that researchers should look elsewhere for the life experiences that reliably lead to growth and not distress.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Research in Personality
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2025.104628
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Growth following adversity is rare: Evidence from a multi-informant longitudinal study of children and adolescents

Brent W. Roberts, Jami F. Young, Cavan Vaux Bonner, Benjamin L. Hankin
2 citations
Journal of Research in Personality
Resilience and Mental Health
4.61
article

Growth following adversity is rare: Evidence from a multi-informant longitudinal study of children and adolescents

Brent W. Roberts, Jami F. Young, Cavan Vaux Bonner, Benjamin L. Hankin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Tested whether adversity is necessary for psychological growth. • Latent growth curve models applied to a multi-informant longitudinal study of youth. • The average association between adversity and growth was either null or negative. • A small sub-group grew despite adversity; however, most grew without adversity. • Researchers should look elsewhere for life experiences that reliably lead to growth. The idea that adversity is necessary for psychological growth pervades cultural narratives and lay theories. We empirically tested this notion with a multi-informant, longitudinal study of children and adolescents ( n = 682). Initial adversity was not associated with change in effortful control and emotional stability, while increasing adversity was negatively correlated with growth. However, a small sub-group of individuals still managed to grow despite adversity. The narrative that adversity is crucial for growth likely originated, and continues to survive, because scholars and laypeople focus on this minority who grow despite adversity, while overlooking the overall null or negative association. The accumulated evidence suggests that researchers should look elsewhere for the life experiences that reliably lead to growth and not distress.

Journal of Research in PersonalityVol. 117
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
National Science Foundation, National Institute of Mental Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Resilience and Mental Health
4.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.