Exception and typicality, logically framed

Abstract This paper presents a novel proof-theoretic approach to a logic specifically designed to handle exceptions and typicality. Our method extends the classical first-order sequent calculus by incorporating a specialized framework to manage both negative extra-logical information (explicit exceptions) and positive information (background assumptions). We prove that the resulting sequent calculi satisfy the cut-elimination theorem, thereby ensuring strong analytical properties. Furthermore, we show how this framework effectively models traditional reasoning patterns involving conflicting information and typicality. Finally, we establish a natural correspondence between our approach and the Kraus-Lehmann-Magidor postulates, further grounding our work within established theoretical foundations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Logic Language and Information
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-025-09437-9
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exception and typicality, logically framed

Matteo Tesi, Mario Piazza
3 citations
Journal of Logic Language and Information
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
7.44
article

Exception and typicality, logically framed

Matteo Tesi, Mario Piazza
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents a novel proof-theoretic approach to a logic specifically designed to handle exceptions and typicality. Our method extends the classical first-order sequent calculus by incorporating a specialized framework to manage both negative extra-logical information (explicit exceptions) and positive information (background assumptions). We prove that the resulting sequent calculi satisfy the cut-elimination theorem, thereby ensuring strong analytical properties. Furthermore, we show how this framework effectively models traditional reasoning patterns involving conflicting information and typicality. Finally, we establish a natural correspondence between our approach and the Kraus-Lehmann-Magidor postulates, further grounding our work within established theoretical foundations.

Journal of Logic Language and InformationVol. 34(3-4)
University of Applied Sciences Technikum Wien (AT), TU Wien (AT), Scuola Normale Superiore (IT)
Scuola Normale Superiore, Austrian Science Fund, Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
7.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.