Process failure mode – product failure mechanism- effect analysis ((PFM)²EA): A novel risk assessment methodology for automated battery disassembly - Integrating process and product safety in repurposing

The increasing adoption of electric vehicles has led to a surge in end-of-life traction batteries, necessitating safe and efficient repurposing strategies. This study introduces a novel risk assessment methodology, the process failure mode - product failure mechanism - effect analysis ((PFM)²EA), designed to evaluate safety risks in automated battery disassembly processes. The (PFM)²EA method combines two established risk analysis approaches: one focused on manufacturing processes (process failure mode and effects analysis - PFMEA) and another on product failure behaviors (failure modes, mechanisms, and effects analysis - FMMEA). By linking these perspectives, the method addresses the critical gap between process and product risks in separation processes for battery repurposing. Our approach employs a tripartite risk categorization framework, distinguishing between immediate safety hazards, long-term safety risks, and potential performance issues of reused components. The method introduces a fourth variable to the traditional scoring system, which considers severity, likelihood of occurrence, and detectability of a product failure, by adding a fourth factor: the likelihood of process failure. The determination of which was simplified by implementing an analytic hierarchy process. This enhancement allows for a more comprehensive assessment of potential hazards originating from product failure mechanisms triggered by process faults. To validate the (PFM)²EA method, a preemptive risk assessment of theoretical automated disassembly processes for three commercially available battery systems has been conducted. The study focused on processes aimed at extracting energy storage components for reuse and repurposing, examining how safety considerations influence process selection. The findings demonstrate the effectiveness of the (PFM)²EA method in identifying and prioritizing safety risks in battery disassembly processes. A Monte Carlo Simulation confirmed the robustness of the risk evaluations under input uncertainty, reinforcing the method’s reliability. This research contributes to the development of safer and more efficient battery repurposing strategies, addressing critical challenges in the circular economy of energy storage systems. • Identifying hazards in the planning phase of automated battery disassembly processes. • Emphasizing non-destructive dismantling processes for reuse & repurpose. • Based on benchmark data of three different battery systems. • Influence of battery design choices on hazards & their impact on second-life use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Manufacturing Systems
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2025.06.006
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Process failure mode – product failure mechanism- effect analysis ((PFM)²EA): A novel risk assessment methodology for automated battery disassembly - Integrating process and product safety in repurposing

Florian Feist, Christian Ellersdorfer, Franz Haas, Harald Sehrschön et al.
3 citations
Journal of Manufacturing Systems
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
2.05
article

Process failure mode – product failure mechanism- effect analysis ((PFM)²EA): A novel risk assessment methodology for automated battery disassembly - Integrating process and product safety in repurposing

Florian Feist, Christian Ellersdorfer, Franz Haas, Harald Sehrschön, Stefan Grollitsch, Gernot Schlögl, S. Jovic
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The increasing adoption of electric vehicles has led to a surge in end-of-life traction batteries, necessitating safe and efficient repurposing strategies. This study introduces a novel risk assessment methodology, the process failure mode - product failure mechanism - effect analysis ((PFM)²EA), designed to evaluate safety risks in automated battery disassembly processes. The (PFM)²EA method combines two established risk analysis approaches: one focused on manufacturing processes (process failure mode and effects analysis - PFMEA) and another on product failure behaviors (failure modes, mechanisms, and effects analysis - FMMEA). By linking these perspectives, the method addresses the critical gap between process and product risks in separation processes for battery repurposing. Our approach employs a tripartite risk categorization framework, distinguishing between immediate safety hazards, long-term safety risks, and potential performance issues of reused components. The method introduces a fourth variable to the traditional scoring system, which considers severity, likelihood of occurrence, and detectability of a product failure, by adding a fourth factor: the likelihood of process failure. The determination of which was simplified by implementing an analytic hierarchy process. This enhancement allows for a more comprehensive assessment of potential hazards originating from product failure mechanisms triggered by process faults. To validate the (PFM)²EA method, a preemptive risk assessment of theoretical automated disassembly processes for three commercially available battery systems has been conducted. The study focused on processes aimed at extracting energy storage components for reuse and repurposing, examining how safety considerations influence process selection. The findings demonstrate the effectiveness of the (PFM)²EA method in identifying and prioritizing safety risks in battery disassembly processes. A Monte Carlo Simulation confirmed the robustness of the risk evaluations under input uncertainty, reinforcing the method’s reliability. This research contributes to the development of safer and more efficient battery repurposing strategies, addressing critical challenges in the circular economy of energy storage systems. • Identifying hazards in the planning phase of automated battery disassembly processes. • Emphasizing non-destructive dismantling processes for reuse & repurpose. • Based on benchmark data of three different battery systems. • Influence of battery design choices on hazards & their impact on second-life use.

Journal of Manufacturing SystemsVol. 82
Graz University of Technology (AT)
TU Graz, Internationale Beziehungen und Mobilitätsprogramme, Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
2.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.