The role of farmer discussion groups in promoting sustainable farming practices: Drivers of participation and environmental impact

• Farmer Discussion Group membership boosts environmental performance. • Higher education influences participation in sustainability-focused farmer groups. • Environmental and profit objectives should be combined in one discussion group. Farmer discussion groups are increasingly recognised for their role in contributing to economic improvement, however, information relating to their effectiveness in improving environmental performance remains limited. This study investigates the drivers of participation in Environmental Business Development Groups (EBDGs) and evaluates the impact on farm-level environmental performance compared to a profitability-focused Business Development Groups (BDGs). A logistic regression model was used to identify factors influencing EBDG participation, while an Environmental Performance Index (EPI) was constructed to quantify environmental outcomes. Impact evaluation employed Mahalanobis Distance Matching (MDM), with Propensity Score Matching (PSM) applied for robustness. Our results indicate that the farmers’ age, higher educational qualifications, agricultural education, land area farmed, and farm diversification are positive and statistically significant factors influencing participation in EBDGs. Furthermore, membership of the EBDGs has a positive and statistically significant impact on farmers’ environmental performance compared to non-members of any group, with standardised Average Treatment Effect (ATE) and Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT) estimates of 0.67 and 0.63 for EBDGs and 0.53 and 0.47 for BDG, respectively. However, when comparing EBDGs directly to BDGs, no statistically significant difference was found. These results offer valuable insights for policymakers seeking to enhance farmer engagement in environmental programs, highlighting the importance of tailored extension strategies to maximise environmental benefits in the agricultural sector. Encouraging farmer participation in structured discussion groups could be a viable pathway to achieving agricultural sustainability goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113714
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.83

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of farmer discussion groups in promoting sustainable farming practices: Drivers of participation and environmental impact

Adewale Henry Adenuga, Claire Jack
1 citations
Ecological Indicators
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
4.83
article

The role of farmer discussion groups in promoting sustainable farming practices: Drivers of participation and environmental impact

Adewale Henry Adenuga, Claire Jack
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Farmer Discussion Group membership boosts environmental performance. • Higher education influences participation in sustainability-focused farmer groups. • Environmental and profit objectives should be combined in one discussion group. Farmer discussion groups are increasingly recognised for their role in contributing to economic improvement, however, information relating to their effectiveness in improving environmental performance remains limited. This study investigates the drivers of participation in Environmental Business Development Groups (EBDGs) and evaluates the impact on farm-level environmental performance compared to a profitability-focused Business Development Groups (BDGs). A logistic regression model was used to identify factors influencing EBDG participation, while an Environmental Performance Index (EPI) was constructed to quantify environmental outcomes. Impact evaluation employed Mahalanobis Distance Matching (MDM), with Propensity Score Matching (PSM) applied for robustness. Our results indicate that the farmers’ age, higher educational qualifications, agricultural education, land area farmed, and farm diversification are positive and statistically significant factors influencing participation in EBDGs. Furthermore, membership of the EBDGs has a positive and statistically significant impact on farmers’ environmental performance compared to non-members of any group, with standardised Average Treatment Effect (ATE) and Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT) estimates of 0.67 and 0.63 for EBDGs and 0.53 and 0.47 for BDG, respectively. However, when comparing EBDGs directly to BDGs, no statistically significant difference was found. These results offer valuable insights for policymakers seeking to enhance farmer engagement in environmental programs, highlighting the importance of tailored extension strategies to maximise environmental benefits in the agricultural sector. Encouraging farmer participation in structured discussion groups could be a viable pathway to achieving agricultural sustainability goals.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 177
Queen's University Belfast (GB), Agri Food and Biosciences Institute (GB)
Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs, UK Government
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
4.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.