Comparative Severity of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Peri-Implantitis Versus Periodontitis: A Prospective Observational Study

Introduction Peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis are driven by the same periodontal pathogens implicated in atherosclerosis. Whether peri-implant infection influences coronary artery disease is uncertain. We compared subgingival microbial profiles and coronary stenosis in patients with dental implants versus dentate controls undergoing coronary angiography. Methods In this prospective cross-sectional study (December 6, 2021, to January 24, 2024), we enrolled 88 men (45-64 years) referred for elective or emergency coronary arteriography at a tertiary center. Thirty-seven patients with at least one implant (Group 1) and 51 dentate patients (Group 2) underwent standardized periodontal examination, subgingival sampling for real-time polymerase chain reaction quantification of <i>Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans</i> and red-complex species (<i>Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, Tannerella forsythia</i>), and assessment of systemic risk factors. Coronary stenosis was graded angiographically and summarized by vessel-specific percent narrowing and the SYNTAX I score. Group differences were analyzed with Mann-Whitney U, χ², or Fisher's exact tests (α = 0.05). Results The cohorts were similar in body mass index, lipid profile, diabetes prevalence, and hypertension control. Implant carriers were older (median 60 vs. 55 years, p = 0.001) and more often received statins (75.7% vs. 54.9%, p = 0.046). Median counts of <i>T. denticola</i> (210 × 10³ vs. 100 × 10³ genomes) and <i>P. gingivalis</i> (32 × 10³ vs. 31 × 10³ genomes) were higher in Group 1, whereas total bacterial load was greater in Group 2 (p = 0.026). Implant carriers exhibited more severe stenosis of the circumflex (80% vs. 20%, p = 0.006) and right coronary arteries (75% vs. 20%, p = 0.025); SYNTAX I scores did not differ. Conclusions Peri-implant inflammatory disease was associated with higher concentrations of virulent red-complex bacteria and with marked stenosis of the circumflex and right coronary arteries, independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Routine periodontal surveillance and early management of peri-implant mucositis may represent adjunctive strategies to mitigate coronary artery disease progression in implant recipients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.85794
Primary Topic
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Severity of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Peri-Implantitis Versus Periodontitis: A Prospective Observational Study

Atanaska Nyagolova, Velislava Slavova
Cureus
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
article

Comparative Severity of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Peri-Implantitis Versus Periodontitis: A Prospective Observational Study

Atanaska Nyagolova, Velislava Slavova
article en

Abstract

Introduction Peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis are driven by the same periodontal pathogens implicated in atherosclerosis. Whether peri-implant infection influences coronary artery disease is uncertain. We compared subgingival microbial profiles and coronary stenosis in patients with dental implants versus dentate controls undergoing coronary angiography. Methods In this prospective cross-sectional study (December 6, 2021, to January 24, 2024), we enrolled 88 men (45-64 years) referred for elective or emergency coronary arteriography at a tertiary center. Thirty-seven patients with at least one implant (Group 1) and 51 dentate patients (Group 2) underwent standardized periodontal examination, subgingival sampling for real-time polymerase chain reaction quantification of <i>Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans</i> and red-complex species (<i>Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, Tannerella forsythia</i>), and assessment of systemic risk factors. Coronary stenosis was graded angiographically and summarized by vessel-specific percent narrowing and the SYNTAX I score. Group differences were analyzed with Mann-Whitney U, χ², or Fisher's exact tests (α = 0.05). Results The cohorts were similar in body mass index, lipid profile, diabetes prevalence, and hypertension control. Implant carriers were older (median 60 vs. 55 years, p = 0.001) and more often received statins (75.7% vs. 54.9%, p = 0.046). Median counts of <i>T. denticola</i> (210 × 10³ vs. 100 × 10³ genomes) and <i>P. gingivalis</i> (32 × 10³ vs. 31 × 10³ genomes) were higher in Group 1, whereas total bacterial load was greater in Group 2 (p = 0.026). Implant carriers exhibited more severe stenosis of the circumflex (80% vs. 20%, p = 0.006) and right coronary arteries (75% vs. 20%, p = 0.025); SYNTAX I scores did not differ. Conclusions Peri-implant inflammatory disease was associated with higher concentrations of virulent red-complex bacteria and with marked stenosis of the circumflex and right coronary arteries, independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Routine periodontal surveillance and early management of peri-implant mucositis may represent adjunctive strategies to mitigate coronary artery disease progression in implant recipients.

CureusVol. 17(6)
Medical University of Varna (BG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.