When to boost: How dose timing determines the epidemic threshold

Most vaccines require multiple doses, the first to induce recognition and antibody production and subsequent doses to boost the primary response and achieve optimal protection. We show that properly prioritizing the administration of first and second doses can shift the epidemic threshold, separating the disease-free from the endemic state and potentially preventing widespread outbreaks. Assuming homogeneous mixing, we prove that at a low vaccination rate, the best strategy is to give absolute priority to first doses. In contrast, for high vaccination rates, we propose a scheduling that outperforms a first-come first-served approach. We identify the threshold that separates these two scenarios and derive the optimal prioritization scheme and interdose interval. Agent-based simulations on real and synthetic contact networks validate our findings. We provide specific guidelines for effective resource allocation, showing that adjusting the timing between the primer and booster significantly impacts epidemic outcomes and can determine whether the disease persists or disappears.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Review Research
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/cykd-2rjn
Citations
1
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When to boost: How dose timing determines the epidemic threshold

Lena Rebecca Zastrow, Enrico Mastrostefano, Stefano Guarino, Francesca Colaiori et al.
1 citations
Physical Review Research
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
1.40
article

When to boost: How dose timing determines the epidemic threshold

Lena Rebecca Zastrow, Enrico Mastrostefano, Stefano Guarino, Francesca Colaiori, Francesca Pelusi, Karl J. Friston
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Most vaccines require multiple doses, the first to induce recognition and antibody production and subsequent doses to boost the primary response and achieve optimal protection. We show that properly prioritizing the administration of first and second doses can shift the epidemic threshold, separating the disease-free from the endemic state and potentially preventing widespread outbreaks. Assuming homogeneous mixing, we prove that at a low vaccination rate, the best strategy is to give absolute priority to first doses. In contrast, for high vaccination rates, we propose a scheduling that outperforms a first-come first-served approach. We identify the threshold that separates these two scenarios and derive the optimal prioritization scheme and interdose interval. Agent-based simulations on real and synthetic contact networks validate our findings. We provide specific guidelines for effective resource allocation, showing that adjusting the timing between the primer and booster significantly impacts epidemic outcomes and can determine whether the disease persists or disappears.

Physical Review ResearchVol. 7(3)
Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (IT), Institute for Experimental Endocrinology and Oncology (IT), Institute for Research on Innovation and Services for Development (IT), Institute for Complex Systems (IT), Confederazione Nazionale dell'Artigianato e Della Piccola e Media Impresa (IT), Geological Survey of India (IN), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When to boost: How dose timing determines the epidemic threshold — Lena Rebecca Zastrow, Enrico Mastrostefano, et al. · Physical Review Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS