When to boost: How dose timing determines the epidemic threshold
Most vaccines require multiple doses, the first to induce recognition and antibody production and subsequent doses to boost the primary response and achieve optimal protection. We show that properly prioritizing the administration of first and second doses can shift the epidemic threshold, separating the disease-free from the endemic state and potentially preventing widespread outbreaks. Assuming homogeneous mixing, we prove that at a low vaccination rate, the best strategy is to give absolute priority to first doses. In contrast, for high vaccination rates, we propose a scheduling that outperforms a first-come first-served approach. We identify the threshold that separates these two scenarios and derive the optimal prioritization scheme and interdose interval. Agent-based simulations on real and synthetic contact networks validate our findings. We provide specific guidelines for effective resource allocation, showing that adjusting the timing between the primer and booster significantly impacts epidemic outcomes and can determine whether the disease persists or disappears.
Authors
- Lena Rebecca Zastrow
- Enrico Mastrostefano (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0023-7943)
- Stefano Guarino (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1545-7711)
- Francesca Colaiori (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7165-1941)
- Francesca Pelusi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9761-5110)
- Karl J. Friston
Institutions
- Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (IT)
- Institute for Experimental Endocrinology and Oncology (IT)
- Institute for Research on Innovation and Services for Development (IT)
- Institute for Complex Systems (IT)
- Confederazione Nazionale dell'Artigianato e Della Piccola e Media Impresa (IT)
- Geological Survey of India (IN)
- Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Physical Review Research
- Published
- 2025-06-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1103/cykd-2rjn
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.40