Education and populism: constructing a shared ontology through Laclau and Lacan

Abstract This article explores how, methodologically, to study the relationship between education and populism without limiting one to a thematic appendix of the other. Political science tends to view education as a tool of populism, while educational theory tends to reduce education to a mechanism for resistance against populism. This binary framing obscures the potential for a shared ontology with an instrumental understanding of the relation between education and populism which is, itself, articulated in reductive terms. Instead of treating populism as an external force shaping education, this article examines its underlying articulatory conditions, stripping away essentialist assumptions. It argues that populism and education do not stand in a predetermined relationship that reduces one to the antidote or tool of the other, but are linked through a common ontology with shared conditions of articulation. By progressively refining key concepts and connotations often brought up in research on education’s relationship to populism, the article constructs a shared ontology for them. This analysis draws on the work of Laclau and Mouffe, as well as Lacanian psychoanalysis, situating the discussion within a broader theoretical framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Philosophy of Education
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhaf037
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Political theory and Gramsci
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Education and populism: constructing a shared ontology through Laclau and Lacan

Abdellatif Atif
1 citations
Journal of Philosophy of Education
Political theory and Gramsci
4.20
article

Education and populism: constructing a shared ontology through Laclau and Lacan

Abdellatif Atif
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article explores how, methodologically, to study the relationship between education and populism without limiting one to a thematic appendix of the other. Political science tends to view education as a tool of populism, while educational theory tends to reduce education to a mechanism for resistance against populism. This binary framing obscures the potential for a shared ontology with an instrumental understanding of the relation between education and populism which is, itself, articulated in reductive terms. Instead of treating populism as an external force shaping education, this article examines its underlying articulatory conditions, stripping away essentialist assumptions. It argues that populism and education do not stand in a predetermined relationship that reduces one to the antidote or tool of the other, but are linked through a common ontology with shared conditions of articulation. By progressively refining key concepts and connotations often brought up in research on education’s relationship to populism, the article constructs a shared ontology for them. This analysis draws on the work of Laclau and Mouffe, as well as Lacanian psychoanalysis, situating the discussion within a broader theoretical framework.

Journal of Philosophy of EducationVol. 60(1-2)
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE), COPE Galway (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Political theory and Gramsci
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.