Carbon dioxide flush as a soil health indicator in contrasting edaphoclimatic conditions

• The CO 2 flush (F CO2 ) detects cropping intensity differences, especially at 0–5 cm. • F CO2 reliably distinguishes crop rotations across diverse edaphoclimatic conditions. • The F CO2 stratification shows weak links to soil health and management practices. • F CO2 was found to be a fast, low-cost way to assess soil health across environments. Developing a reliable soil health indicator (SHI) is essential for accurately assessing soil condition in the context of sustainable agriculture. However, current SHIs are often labor-intensive or insufficiently sensitive to management practices. We evaluated a 3-day aerobic incubation at 40 °C of re-wetted soil samples [i.e., carbon dioxide flush (F CO2 )] and its stratification ratio (SR FCO2 ) as potential SHIs. Under a wide range of edaphoclimatic conditions, we assessed: (i) their capacity to discriminate contrasting cropping systems (soybean monoculture, soybean–cover crop, and a complex rotation), and (ii) their association with edaphic variables. All differences and correlations were considered statistically significant at a p-value below 0.05. The F CO2 effectively differentiated soybean monoculture from more diverse cropping systems, particularly in the 0–5 cm soil layer. A stronger association of F CO2 with cropping intensity was observed (R 2 = 0.60 at 0–5 cm; R 2 = 0.42 at 0–20 cm) than for SR FCO2 (R 2 = 0.18). Unlike SR FCO2 , F CO2 correlated strongly with most of the evaluated biochemical (r = 0.43–0.80) and biological (r = 0.28–0.57) properties across all sampled layers; with some physical properties such as aggregate stability (r = 0.67–0.78), clay content (r = 0.19 at 0–5 cm), and bulk density (r = –0.37 to –0.33); and with selected chemical properties, including inorganic phosphorus (r = –0.40) and extractable phosphorus (r = –0.46). Overall, F CO2 at 0–5 cm is a sensitive, low-cost indicator that responds to management intensity and is linked to key soil functions. We recommend its use as a robust SHI for monitoring soil degradation and guiding sustainable agricultural practices across contrasting edaphoclimatic conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113732
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon dioxide flush as a soil health indicator in contrasting edaphoclimatic conditions

Gisela Vanesa García, Cecilia Crespo, Nicolás Wyngaard, Walter D. Carciochi et al.
Ecological Indicators
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

Carbon dioxide flush as a soil health indicator in contrasting edaphoclimatic conditions

Gisela Vanesa García, Cecilia Crespo, Nicolás Wyngaard, Walter D. Carciochi, Hernán R. Saínz Rozas, Lucila Bassi, Pablo Barbieri, Nahuel Ignacio Reussi Calvo
article en

Abstract

• The CO 2 flush (F CO2 ) detects cropping intensity differences, especially at 0–5 cm. • F CO2 reliably distinguishes crop rotations across diverse edaphoclimatic conditions. • The F CO2 stratification shows weak links to soil health and management practices. • F CO2 was found to be a fast, low-cost way to assess soil health across environments. Developing a reliable soil health indicator (SHI) is essential for accurately assessing soil condition in the context of sustainable agriculture. However, current SHIs are often labor-intensive or insufficiently sensitive to management practices. We evaluated a 3-day aerobic incubation at 40 °C of re-wetted soil samples [i.e., carbon dioxide flush (F CO2 )] and its stratification ratio (SR FCO2 ) as potential SHIs. Under a wide range of edaphoclimatic conditions, we assessed: (i) their capacity to discriminate contrasting cropping systems (soybean monoculture, soybean–cover crop, and a complex rotation), and (ii) their association with edaphic variables. All differences and correlations were considered statistically significant at a p-value below 0.05. The F CO2 effectively differentiated soybean monoculture from more diverse cropping systems, particularly in the 0–5 cm soil layer. A stronger association of F CO2 with cropping intensity was observed (R 2 = 0.60 at 0–5 cm; R 2 = 0.42 at 0–20 cm) than for SR FCO2 (R 2 = 0.18). Unlike SR FCO2 , F CO2 correlated strongly with most of the evaluated biochemical (r = 0.43–0.80) and biological (r = 0.28–0.57) properties across all sampled layers; with some physical properties such as aggregate stability (r = 0.67–0.78), clay content (r = 0.19 at 0–5 cm), and bulk density (r = –0.37 to –0.33); and with selected chemical properties, including inorganic phosphorus (r = –0.40) and extractable phosphorus (r = –0.46). Overall, F CO2 at 0–5 cm is a sensitive, low-cost indicator that responds to management intensity and is linked to key soil functions. We recommend its use as a robust SHI for monitoring soil degradation and guiding sustainable agricultural practices across contrasting edaphoclimatic conditions.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 176
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), National University of Mar del Plata (AR), Universidad Católica de La Plata (AR), National Agricultural Technology Institute (AR)
Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.