Vegetation restoration slowdown in desertification control zones of China around the 2010s

• Evaluating shifts in vegetation restoration trends and their drivers in Desertification Control Zones of China. • The recovery trend of vegetation began to slow down in DCZ after 2011. • Climatic factors have caused the slowdown in vegetation recovery after 2011. • Precipitation and temperature were the primary factors slowing down vegetation recovery. • Human activities have had a stable positive impact on vegetation recovery. Since 2000, China has invested over RMB 300 billion in large-scale ecological restoration projects in northern China to combat desertification. Over the past two decades, significant progress has been achieved in vegetation restoration, particularly in key areas such as Erdos, Nunkiang, and Horqin. However, is the trend of vegetation restoration in the Desertification Control Zones (DCZ) increasing continuously? What are the driving factors for the change in the vegetation restoration trend? Existing research has not yet reached a definitive conclusion on this matter. To figure out the changes and drivers of vegetation recovery trends, we assessed shifts in vegetation trends within the DCZ over the period 2000–2023 using Pettitt’s test and residual trend analysis based on fractional vegetation cover (FVC) and climate data. The results indicate that: The recovery trend of FVC in the DCZ began to slow down since 2012; The FVC recovery trend was 0.208 %yr −1 from 2000 to 2011, then slowed to 0.065 %yr −1 after 2011. Climatic factors caused the slowdown in FVC recovery; the average contribution of climatic factors to FVC recovery in the DCZ was 0.071 %yr −1 before 2011 and declined to −0.086 % yr −1 after 2011. Precipitation (−0.049 %yr −1 ) and temperature (−0.026 %yr −1 ) exhibited the most substantial negative effects after 2011. Human activities have had a stable positive impact on FVC recovery, contributing 0.137 %yr −1 before 2011 and 0.151 %yr −1 after 2011. The negative impact of climate change on vegetation recovery should be considered in desertification control practice. Future desertification control practices should be based on natural conditions to ensure the continued effectiveness of investments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113670
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vegetation restoration slowdown in desertification control zones of China around the 2010s

Xiao Hu, Jifu Liu, Yuke Zhou, Zeshi Li et al.
2 citations
Ecological Indicators
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
2.21
article

Vegetation restoration slowdown in desertification control zones of China around the 2010s

Xiao Hu, Jifu Liu, Yuke Zhou, Zeshi Li, Lianyou Liu, Yixin Chen, Hang Li, Hong Jia
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Evaluating shifts in vegetation restoration trends and their drivers in Desertification Control Zones of China. • The recovery trend of vegetation began to slow down in DCZ after 2011. • Climatic factors have caused the slowdown in vegetation recovery after 2011. • Precipitation and temperature were the primary factors slowing down vegetation recovery. • Human activities have had a stable positive impact on vegetation recovery. Since 2000, China has invested over RMB 300 billion in large-scale ecological restoration projects in northern China to combat desertification. Over the past two decades, significant progress has been achieved in vegetation restoration, particularly in key areas such as Erdos, Nunkiang, and Horqin. However, is the trend of vegetation restoration in the Desertification Control Zones (DCZ) increasing continuously? What are the driving factors for the change in the vegetation restoration trend? Existing research has not yet reached a definitive conclusion on this matter. To figure out the changes and drivers of vegetation recovery trends, we assessed shifts in vegetation trends within the DCZ over the period 2000–2023 using Pettitt’s test and residual trend analysis based on fractional vegetation cover (FVC) and climate data. The results indicate that: The recovery trend of FVC in the DCZ began to slow down since 2012; The FVC recovery trend was 0.208 %yr −1 from 2000 to 2011, then slowed to 0.065 %yr −1 after 2011. Climatic factors caused the slowdown in FVC recovery; the average contribution of climatic factors to FVC recovery in the DCZ was 0.071 %yr −1 before 2011 and declined to −0.086 % yr −1 after 2011. Precipitation (−0.049 %yr −1 ) and temperature (−0.026 %yr −1 ) exhibited the most substantial negative effects after 2011. Human activities have had a stable positive impact on FVC recovery, contributing 0.137 %yr −1 before 2011 and 0.151 %yr −1 after 2011. The negative impact of climate change on vegetation recovery should be considered in desertification control practice. Future desertification control practices should be based on natural conditions to ensure the continued effectiveness of investments.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 176
Beijing Normal University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.